IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Chair Review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-11

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Wed, 27 March 2024 10:43 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38361C14F60A; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 03:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dMowDBDRCzmb; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 03:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 208F4C14F5EE; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 03:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crumpet.local (vpn.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.netability.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1CC2B061F; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 10:43:25 +0000 (GMT)
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Andrew Alston - IETF <andrew-ietf@liquid.tech>, spring-chairs@ietf.org, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
References: <CAMMESsw=PihfkO3nECiBnCALfCC=vTRn6c1_OYPK-jT5=yHFZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESszTSki9ct+B+spuX=JOo33Uecv=AFwLmVcQw_cdkBu0Tw@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S36VW9R+vfsM4Q9mxbVCRg1JBdw8kJF+chpnnLneNF36RQ@mail.gmail.com> <BL0PR05MB531629A0BC6BF060A935DF0DAE352@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR03MB6300DD1FAFAB9234AEA12131F6352@PH0PR03MB6300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <BL0PR05MB53168835A27B7C9AE33F18D0AE352@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR03MB6300C058ABBD13D7CA8D939BF6352@PH0PR03MB6300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <BL0PR05MB531627290AD6D971806D897CAE352@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CALx6S35asVg_Lc1Oq-YkarTrXir-WBG1P6AGhbSX33wDQXx8ug@mail.gmail.com> <DU2PR03MB80215E1BC0942FBF79E39BABFA342@DU2PR03MB8021.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHPUQHS=wp+mzwELBBH=hsC0_gGsMQJRsbr1atHjaFEyQ@mail.gmail.com> <DU2PR03MB802100C85D3CAA29FBBFA4F6FA342@DU2PR03MB8021.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMGpTT0X=RgqLYoMS9DovWLF39Ot4h=7PtzUyo184nszNw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <0bbfe297-420c-7086-962d-9fe6d5eab14f@foobar.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 10:43:22 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.60
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMGpTT0X=RgqLYoMS9DovWLF39Ot4h=7PtzUyo184nszNw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/447Hs4skVKynEfo6s1X537cnZBE>
Subject: Re: [spring] Chair Review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-11
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 10:43:35 -0000

Robert Raszuk wrote on 27/03/2024 10:13:
> WGLC on this doc started Jan 22nd - Today we have March 27th - was the 
> result of the working group's last call announced and I missed it ? 
> Looking at the list it seems this draft got pretty overwhelming support 
> already. Why are we not progressing ? What is holding us ?

rfc7282.

Consensus is not weight of numbers.

Nick

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status