IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 20 December 2019 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFD11201E4 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:19:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jshJDprmoy-W for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:18:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA22D12018B for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:18:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id r14so7042577qke.13 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:18:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qriLDFFPtWhLf0ig8n+E5Ah9Ozyi4aOEYCQU69VWBTo=; b=F66BF0tcNGPDCR5zHwrdQN2agQ2dkhlYgS6njXOypjIh1mwHnXWdPfH6zHiFaahd8c wEWQZWlME7C4EwXgPUv3IE1oxb/u6zO6FXBiOnOwOWKrAKecL5WOv8O/E9qIVj84CVsS pD8ODkubPOAzZ3vcJvBqtZxCgVtKAt8YMg6+udqB3oEkBk75cnxZq7RVD2N3Aq/00LWc /jMez5VQeeyXdsiOa8mI+Ev/v1JSlyYLmeRvakNROsvZCCn4IZmuJoZb69HBFsZDEO71 TFP0U1LvkoOI3FMowpiQgoPGPFYGL8wv6gRfd9USW+6wEMbYjeWpgjR25CdKThpbAC9G vqbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qriLDFFPtWhLf0ig8n+E5Ah9Ozyi4aOEYCQU69VWBTo=; b=YwNFvemVHcRl0CYbXshgJZQkHWeiYny0WNqz+aCAC3rm5EbHXFdHfA2xFWkf+iwGEp goDZ2r4Vo8xauDysjXAi5jbRG608lECprJNoOq58tiSnIfpE+H8H6CIX7r4y9EX/cqqX 6a35nntheEfghGmIZISPFQv3TYGYiG/xphC0KRNXQxsv4faISGmqnsJxvmqX1aMyoGmd PyizqRs3xsNjC3nX0tvfvas97nwIt2xYXTTmaYy+AS5lQAELt+mgO27WzrywPXcMeYKS nXMq5g55Mrt/P1cjTUyFmxY+yX2ovdbL9vx71qj+/VK+udj/wSqvYB7mYn20wQE8BYQ3 Ut0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVa/tqxxp68Bi/zJqX8XHLwAkrsdfnNiabLC4KbI3be78383Vmq WKhs6PQ7WRKMz4nAYaNmjVJFj8stAE4UbguoXEQr9w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzIx4Fpy6oY8SEPbISkCWuuR3gwO82UFp5ih1BAoazhDSpZPKgyWhtoOw01Iv53M1qLnlGMdV5OnPIeJ3jcFM0=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4ac6:: with SMTP id x189mr12090733qka.219.1576833537471; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:18:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157609408568.11496.11799785813274132900@ietfa.amsl.com> <4c762fc5-8a61-e182-a9cc-d45b0f586ccc@gmail.com> <3A12D735-7899-4679-8FC8-DF8875D40A62@cisco.com> <628e5dfb-7ba4-d841-ebeb-cfc52d7294f1@gmail.com> <ACEF56BF-B851-43B2-9211-B6C39C34DB63@cisco.com> <49b7e45f-a26f-cf4a-f8be-9aa917c34203@gmail.com> <CAOj+MMFBKFBxacT9Z=HR89U10d9=jG-b8ypx4ukQgb0EFfN=Uw@mail.gmail.com> <0f492db1-d168-473c-8447-9e08d51c2039@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0f492db1-d168-473c-8447-9e08d51c2039@gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 10:18:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMEom8JcffnOdH0dsDnN5hzfPASsm=0uz8O+P68=EP_z0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000df3a25059a1f2a74"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/4wJ8DNPEJqI54q88BCniTDrrB7o>
Subject: Re: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:19:01 -0000

Hi Brian,

Right, but the language in the PSP sub-section does not talk about
> decapsulation.


Sure as in a way there is no decapsulation there. This is Segment N-1 node
not Final Segment End node.

Of course the other way to look at this would be to conceptually describe
this as decapsulation at *each* segment end point and on most just copy the
SRH to a new IPv6 header and on PSP happening on Segment N-1 to not copy
it.

I think the root problem may be using the word "pop", which is relevant in
> the MPLS label stack context but not here, without additional definition.


Well I agree. "POP" does not sound like the best terminology choice here
for SRH removal or deletion :). Now all what is needed for WG to convince
Pablo for massive editing ....

Happy Holidays,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email