[spring] Un-addressed issues in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Mon, 02 March 2020 22:55 UTC
Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0D43A134F for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:55:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sXw6db7IEaH9 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:55:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 115993A1350 for <spring@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:55:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [181.45.84.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 195A6832C2; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:55:29 +0100 (CET)
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <cc500012-34c3-167f-b8a8-577472d971e5@si6networks.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 19:55:21 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/58fuelX7-bH_aCDWTwDP-xdmKwk>
Subject: [spring] Un-addressed issues in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 22:55:38 -0000
Folks, I'm trying to come up with a list of the issues raised during the WGLC of this document. So far, this is what I have: 1) Participants requested a justification for the need of PSP (Penultimate Segment Pop). [PSP-R] 2) Participants noted that PSP violates RFC8200 [IPV6-V] 3) Participants noted that PSP violates the specification of routing headers [SR-V] 4) Participants requested a more prescriptive SID format [SID] Is there anything I've missed? References: [IPV6-V] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/XZ_D_cfPNNzXpi4_ZbuTidMTo4k/ [PSP-R] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/eSP4xVYVgjtCmAMGMkqHedv80jU/ [SID] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/2ApHpreqPTS689pAEyhiZEdTf7k/ [SR-V] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Xrcclo0s4pnug9upG9rUinYMv1I/ Thanks! Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- [spring] Un-addressed issues in draft-ietf-spring… Fernando Gont