Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Hi Chairs,

I've read the latest version of this document and think it is a good starting point to describe a specific usage of SR policy to mimic the characteristics of circuit-based transport paths. Thus I support the adoption. 

I used to have comments about how bandwidth guarantee is achieved with CS-SR policy, and the recent updates in section 3.1 addressed some of my comments. 

While for some of the resource reservation mechanisms, it is not clear in the draft how is a CS-SR policy correlated with the set of reserved resources allocated (logical link, queue, etc.). A dedicate DSCP code point is one option, while it may not always be available. IMO the mechanisms described in draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments could be used for such correlation, and I'd suggest to add that draft as a reference. 

Best regards,
Jie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of IETF Secretariat
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 10:05 PM
> To: draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy@ietf.org; spring-chairs@ietf.org;
> spring@ietf.org
> Subject: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
> draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
> 
> 
> The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state
> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Joel Halpern)
> 
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy/
> 
> Comment:
> This starts a two week adoption call for the subject draft.  Please speak up if
> you support or object to WG adoption.  Two notes: 1) WG adoption is the
> start of the process.  The basic question is whether you agree that the
> subject is worth the working group time to work on, and whether this
> represents a good starting point for the work. 2) Please include explanation
> for your view.  Yes or no are not very helpful answers, as this is not a vote
> but an evaluation of support and concerns. Thank you, Joel (for the WG
> Chairs)
> 
> We expect to close this call at the end of May, 2023.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring