Re: [spring] SRv6 compression

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Tue, 03 August 2021 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299B63A2661 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nwYNQ6WAB_ry for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFFAE3A267A for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id c16so24029044plh.7 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 07:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=uysM/OqliMEzzaOvfv48Er12o1UqCEQTQalybIBhMnE=; b=GcOw5vN6E2SxcgP12HSNYfcgiYVFNcIopLWtXHlYwSSo7wZb/7rXHTz0N1CSGCqx62 P2gSkjxY8y4LCUmjwblVO3O8FXwIaOS/l8kKrks31Q3MRs7DFXbnPsgids6/Yo6TITtW ucEpH1/mUPEv5W5hEwPoEKjGZUaJC79C+EDpkA7o3PRn7TM5fXI+iD4mdg7enmw6Xe38 +7z/CZChPW9LOaNfCCurtSRgZMRO3KtlQMy7LiRSbVZzRL5gagW2qM1sU85KH8Jl1Tbt 5Hny22eB6QDtSShgfyIt3leAcq4cGYGk3bYR3togR8Sck42DtJBVh6osTAgac4amIew6 9rNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=uysM/OqliMEzzaOvfv48Er12o1UqCEQTQalybIBhMnE=; b=sp0EFLYT/uCXcBYK9xv1c9JPmsCYEPX38/6mckuFwUI0mw6oJcskCqrq2kQtZ9uaBv M0jlJimOAaARUzrTIjq6/C8+FJJWTB9Xf3ZnsAe3sHb28Lk+9sjBATeUEbfupFQMt0Cj YzVL2zOj1wjVx/5D7JuCQPb+OEo077BRilyW64DTEg+Ys8t1dCwRfxz0MlYzSQOd7R+K 8FoyFThsTFcpDUwar3LrEt5lS5B5MthKDp6NSJx3dggTtNtJZEFaU9HoYsv/ZvXmKoxl zw+7KKp0A3OcXY4QmeMME0XLTRBkWVcggLrPEbytPkBVIGr8uo480JQ6tR9b6Pjw3TkZ 2AUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531cNnCIW7z/X+XEVO811sXacEjJEGKJ8w39dFXECxqIhHRRBT5U pSHFzShep5iY/PBfNf4wbERccmfyN+k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWsv90zRrkLCPh9XEyxBRtQuMsuTcRqJlHZT2w2ySUFqpA7t/Hr+j8AHUQYwL/nxf3vOQS4A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2882:: with SMTP id f2mr23694652pjd.102.1628002525257; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 07:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u15sm8504894pfn.91.2021.08.03.07.55.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Aug 2021 07:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <985ca908c1de4e809b2cd0a11cbdea58@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:55:22 -0700
Cc: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston=40liquidtelecom.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <43B0D1B9-D9EE-43B4-81B1-2D9A8E4313CC@tony.li>
References: <c76db204c51d4f4fbe1597d24de469d1@h3c.com> <AS8PR03MB76229F54D7E2ED4C42F0285AEEF09@AS8PR03MB7622.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <985ca908c1de4e809b2cd0a11cbdea58@huawei.com>
To: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/7CscfSd2TiuvTDZaZI3taziOcHI>
Subject: Re: [spring] SRv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 14:55:29 -0000

Hi all,

I have a bit of a different perspective.

Whatever solution is selected, it will be basically forever. Vendors will cut this into silicon. Quite literally set in stone. It will get deployed and there will be no turning back.
We should pick the best possible solution because we will have to live with it. Forever. That far surpasses the pain of having to replace whatever folks have deployed so far.

Thus, while I wish no one undue pain, the fact is that current deployment, popularity, and market share aren’t compelling reasons to make a selection. 
We need the technically optimal solution.

Please choose carefully. Please choose wisely. Please choose for the very long haul.

Tony