IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Dispute process (Was: Resignation request)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 11 March 2020 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB463A0CD5; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8w9PDQ9g_FUb; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DBD73A0CC9; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id mq3so69443pjb.0; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mc8RS8WnP4wpOwBXW7ArAHImwKaJ/P5II12pLa6WWa0=; b=Xq+vut4m1ebBTXfrLNMIenWLOKnTPu+WscJOYBZ77ZV61kD2U6MzKczaNSmPysVo8s fHEf0/UN6AWJAR7CMXbeIDKNZch5ZcmMLjBipvT+2wtIzchEOeKph5xE7std/WVqGkrx Zg9wBLtrgos23MI8tFH069Ucjv728L+nW5uQmBGgDMpQJVyfIaZvkalOqGpRjrgXdeuA lkK1KJ7NTjTWippNdv1n1XLkbfGw7ibkSx6cWJ47HuP68SkcRAIkJ8715fhBj8OH/D57 a4naO49GeI0pPKTKFQdy49wOmpehM7wAb4tO/yrJCV2RMiWwSvQ+jP9Jmr5nDkQwH3Ms pbng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mc8RS8WnP4wpOwBXW7ArAHImwKaJ/P5II12pLa6WWa0=; b=JXw1hzN+Q5PFEmek7tu9Qu2bX+yv/aj8WyRpbU8PT1r0AJeNp84NHZzeUW++Cpq5Kr K2WIahaTbp3iiXb/Xt9yumjNrU+uAYLmTFj3Lgmdmfcl9YzgitdTBYuFXiMxezdTrq/R m2yAtwX9nT7YVRWf355u8JD4QxIjFuki8OUCNUgN1LN6Z5wpKiDCrz6BZgSmN7xS+Bh1 /t2a8Nl+Kk5PfqGtS6QP3gpw7VEtsf/BDpJVSDIVY5kk/zAXyJHyw/iZhlAdAa4cjc/z GAzE2k7Q0s8BhX0tQvvSXmawbG6quH6ZkWjp5MCsCSS1+lxxUvm20LwbwGTnlG22RH1t k65A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ15ksLjPyKFqvsWAa5Z7iJU6BYgRPBnqfwz8czs74SLcQfWNJTZ NYlRo55FJUnmLb62sdLRnAhnowD/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvdBoM0OcL6uFmyB3iPT1uOJLPt44ygGwgWSQDfIw8jy3U8dMsoE63qRlxdb7NEqbx+OGNYpw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1b22:: with SMTP id q31mr577347pjq.106.1583886202675; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.37.131] (sc-cs-567-laptop.uoa.auckland.ac.nz. [130.216.37.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s23sm3311483pjp.28.2020.03.10.17.23.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, Alex Bogdanov <bogdanov=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>
References: <3EF6505C-D442-41A4-A681-26ACF818BB4D@sobco.com> <C7B7787A-48E5-407F-9E81-BDEC2F1B2169@steffann.nl> <6651697D-A892-4CAB-BDC1-E385750294D3@gmail.com> <a708fc17-c799-2767-4a35-033b063456f5@pi.nu> <CA+q+MpU6-36xTzZL_-B-9fG8atfOiOF5-rdxFFVQV9_y8GOd8Q@mail.gmail.com> <20200310154115.GX18021@localhost> <EF46D631-4553-4378-9260-6E23BE94B14E@episteme.net> <20200310184518.GY18021@localhost> <604af73d-98a6-5188-79a1-4aa4d4e1d581@gmail.com> <20200310235523.GA18021@localhost>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <73567bfa-2c75-bd94-36b9-8d597ae831a5@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:23:17 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200310235523.GA18021@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/7SWBCA8h2-BylQyXvu2VWPhx12g>
Subject: Re: [spring] Dispute process (Was: Resignation request)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:23:33 -0000

On two specific points:

On 11-Mar-20 12:55, Nico Williams wrote:
...
> Q: How many appeals have there been, and how many have succeeded?

Officially, the history is at:

https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/appeals/
https://www.iab.org/appeals/

I think a lot of the responses are midway between "success" and "failure".
 
> But perhaps we can do post-mortems as a lighter-weight relief process,

On the surface that's an attractive idea, but if it is to be taken
seriously it would need just about as much work as an appeal.

     Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email