Re: [spring] Completion of WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

Lizhenbin <> Wed, 17 February 2021 03:35 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587453A0C37; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:35:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.796
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uShMqBqV6acn; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:35:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C50CF3A0BF7; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:35:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (unknown []) by (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DgNb92zFJz67pCD; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:28:21 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:35:17 +0100
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.2106.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:35:16 +0100
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0509.000; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:35:10 +0800
From: Lizhenbin <>
To: James Guichard <>, "" <>
CC: "" <>
Thread-Topic: Completion of WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn
Thread-Index: AdcAlwYxpZNcfsTFQZm5JwoMxdEK/QDcjMHAADVeJ2A=
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 03:35:10 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D939E0775DGGEMM532MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [spring] Completion of WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 03:35:22 -0000

Hi All,

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR.

Best regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)

From: spring [] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 1:06 AM
To: James Guichard <<>>;<>
Subject: [spring] Completion of WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

Dear WG:

This email ends the 2 week WG adoption call for<>amp;reserved=0>.

Having reviewed all of the responses, the chairs believe that enough support was received to adopt this document into the WG. However, while the document is informational in nature, it does have a normative dependency on<> which will need to successfully complete WG LC before this document will be able to progress from the WG queue. The chairs feel that more work is necessary in terms of definition and interoperability of resource-aware SIDs. In addition several comments were received during the adoption call that will need to be addressed as the document progresses through the WG process. Further, the chairs would like to make it clear that adopting an informational document that proposes a particular solution which utilizes resource-aware SIDs does *not* preclude future adoption of other documents which propose a different solution if the trade-offs are significantly different.

Authors, please resubmit the document as draft-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-00 and also provide explicit confirmation as to whether you are aware of any IPR related to this document.


Jim, Joel & Bruno

From: James Guichard <<>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 5:47 AM
Subject: WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

Dear WG:

This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call for<> ending February 10th 2021.

After review of the document please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption to the mailing list and if you are willing to work on the document, please state this explicitly. This gives the chairs an indication of the energy level of people in the working group willing to work on this document. Please also provide comments/reasons for your support (or lack thereof) as this is a stronger way to indicate your (non) support as this is not a vote.


Jim, Bruno & Joel