Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

[Boris Hassanov <[e-mail]>]

 Agree Jeff.
Thank you.
SY,Boris

    On Friday, April 30, 2021, 11:46:36 PM GMT+3, Jeff Tantsura <[e-mail]> wrote:  
 
 Boris/Ketan,

Traditionally, we have been using Wiki to track implementations status, let’s take the same approach here?

Thanks and have a great weekend
Cheers,JeffOn Apr 27, 2021, 10:48 PM -0700, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant=[e-mail]>, wrote:


Hi Boris,

 

Thanks for your review and feedback.

 

Did you imply that we add an implementation status section in the draft? Or are you suggesting that the chairs poll for implementation and deployment status? I ask because the Implementation Status section is generally removed before publication as RFC.

 

Regarding implementation, I am aware of support for this draft in Cisco’s Routing products for many years now with multiple deployments. I am also aware of other vendor support & operator deployment. However, would request other WG members to respond/confirm.

 

Thanks,

Ketan

 

From: spring <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Boris Hassanov
Sent: 28 April 2021 02:43
To: [e-mail]; James Guichard <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

 

Hi James and all,

 

I read the draft and strongly support its publication as WG document. Very detailed, helpful and interesting document.

I would only add implementation status part because currently it is not easy to get such info about implementation details.

 

Thank you.

 

SY,

Boris

 

On Thursday, April 15, 2021, 9:57:11 PM GMT+3, James Guichard <[e-mail]> wrote:

 

 

Dear WG:

 

This email starts a 2 week Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy [1].

 

Please read this document if you haven’t read the most recent version and send your comments to the SPRING WG list no later than April 29th 2021.

 

If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point.

 

Lastly, if you are an author or contributors for this document please response to the IPR call in the previous email thread. 

 

Thanks!

 

Jim, Joel & Bruno

 
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy/  
 

 

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring