IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law - non-technical side note

Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com> Fri, 06 September 2019 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E2C12006E; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 02:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wsTR22AEndr5; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 02:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E31012001E; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 02:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id r12so3987862pfh.1; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 02:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OqWTswgE2bcQTxZglvJIDEwT17hGq6OBULPA+q1SawI=; b=sj+Mfj2sjsoUvoiZ454ALMO0Qnj6cn5Y6qK7jc+ALXK35g0v1ui6iZpRvUuWOSdZNy MZGNv0SfAwDRmUjFeCOpoi768Se67rgshk4LQExFasmrqvqzURWdRu9d6U1AGSpgBVDO PcpN4E0bZuX998LO3XcTCIucmMOO9zaUIORTOUe85JJJ7dXB7S8H/lnmU+KmeR4hmXw4 QPZ8b5/7MEjyuJ+2j2IJHkZHhy7o3i6Z2PTTzhG4ZP67cVke/fb512v/px1cdPgo/DJ0 cJUmkL2oGSu57IUAawC1LK/MUECeC9/Bp6u3L4gaor1ET+1fcGGOtMkCD3pAMRKjZb6V aqrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OqWTswgE2bcQTxZglvJIDEwT17hGq6OBULPA+q1SawI=; b=D0hEZWZSCTcx1UUk/h8ZlBfYTYQGRUjehtModbsJGXX249oiPxGLVpeBzlKrNdSKNb KJERdgS00SPi++bPUNksTm/ceBT319cMEHuJbXMWDkiBG3GNvOYydORfeBCJXl8k+akc ELu4GnjDjZAowTBsB3zKBxumNw23XZVOYdCG3yJauhcVbRl7FzjlVvKdYO3Q/XDS+iHB OKsISunksQG7hC2MMLKJ4E2VR+zbBbwYqODVjsNI+Usa7F9JEBbCvSnhAfKyh/yWGD0J sUUv7ula4OL75A3G4SqCVlS6KrNRP7jrNuF1gGobMXteMsKDKRxyRaswiM519EYJq0OO DohQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWvLMV/ACFk/EWYP1+2GN6xfMIH5CiZsfK+4ordpkY6BvxN4sE1 uu/dO5JP/VkuFsLPOSFEr/m2FIM/sF1okkalV/0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz07bDOtFqLZb7rm/o5sDGtqpgEzmYHCT3g4o4iDqGBB7/h2HBcL9v0EIxw9RL80U53Ez7YDUR89nqFY5bDMH0=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:550e:: with SMTP id j14mr6326803pgb.302.1567760771336; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 02:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ca6e7a10-1b84-445f-053d-8a666ab4ec90@si6networks.com> <3D8725E7-EAA3-4615-ABA2-FFA53D2F1B14@employees.org> <d81ea605-53d7-61d8-f517-5d9cf1e42339@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d81ea605-53d7-61d8-f517-5d9cf1e42339@gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 11:06:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=+VASk4s8EvQ_gXxoLGkuVkCJFTROaW7Tv8pcm5aX1Tw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000de52270591debfcf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/84UelsDH96kyv_3neO4tTuBjB4E>
Subject: Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law - non-technical side note
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 09:06:15 -0000

Hi Alex,

This is really spot on and very brilliant summary of the state we are in !

And since last 25 years rather proved that the first options is not working
the choice seems pretty clear that we should rather choose the second one.

Best,
R.


On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:57 AM Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> This is a non-technical side note about the Spirit and Letter of the Law
> in IPv6 WG.
>
> In these discussions about IPv6 like routing header, insertion,
> mutability, 64bit, limited domains, multihoming, smart end dumb network,
> and numerous other 'tussles', one is supposed to take a side among one
> of those two:
>
> - maintain rock solid principles, continue the tradition, keep it up
> working as it was designed to and that demonstrated its validity on very
> large scale.
>
> - break away from tradition, foster innovation, things will work anyways
> because humans engineer them and market regulates them.
>
> Only deep convictions about one of those two sides can make IPv6
> deployment and development progress.
>
> On my side, I cant make have such deep convictions.
>
> Alex
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email