[spring] Re: 答复: spring WG Adoption Call for draft-peng-spring-pmtu-sr-policy

[Cheng Li <[e-mail]>]

Sure, support the adoption, two WG drafts(BGP/PCEP) are waiting for this to move forward.

Thanks,
Cheng


-----Original Message-----
From: Aijun Wang <[e-mail]> 
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2024 8:57 AM
To: 'Alvaro Retana' <[e-mail]>; 'SPRING WG' <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; 'spring Chairs' <[e-mail]>
Subject: [spring] 答复: spring WG Adoption Call for draft-peng-spring-pmtu-sr-policy

Yes/Support.

Very curious that this document is adopted after the two related protocols extension WG documents.


Best Regards

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] 代表 Alvaro Retana
发送时间: 2024年6月18日 23:42
收件人: SPRING WG <[e-mail]>
抄送: [e-mail]; spring Chairs <[e-mail]>
主题: [spring] spring WG Adoption Call for draft-peng-spring-pmtu-sr-policy

Dear WG:

This message starts a two-week adoption call for draft-peng-spring-pmtu-sr-policy, ending on July/2nd. From the
Abstract:

   This document defines the Path MTU (PMTU) for Segment Routing (SR)
   Policy (called SR-PMTU). It applies to both Segment Routing over IPv6
   (SRv6) and SR-MPLS. This document specifies the framework of SR-PMTU
   for SR Policy including the link MTU collection, the SR-PMTU
   computation, the SR-PMTU enforcement, and the handling behaviours on
   the headend.


   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-spring-pmtu-sr-policy/


Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoption by the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate support or opposition -- this is not a vote.

If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state it explicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in the working group willing to work on the document.

WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG's time to work on and whether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs are particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who are not authors of the document.

Note that draft-ietf-pce-pcep-pmtu ("Support for Path MTU (PMTU) in the Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)") Normatively references this document. It may be helpful to look at that document too.

Thanks!

Alvaro (for the Chairs)

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [e-mail]
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [e-mail]
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]