[spring] Re: Ask SPRING WG for review draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection
梁艳荣 <liangyanrong@ruijie.com.cn> Sun, 19 January 2025 03:46 UTC
Return-Path: <liangyanrong@ruijie.com.cn>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05013C1388B8 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 19:46:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ruijie.com.cn
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nPKgt_A_oT74 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 19:46:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from va-2-54.ptr.blmpb.com (va-2-54.ptr.blmpb.com [209.127.231.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACB6CC180B7B for <spring@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 19:46:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=feishu2311081108; d=ruijie.com.cn; t=1737258367; h=from:subject: mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:reply-to:content-type: mime-version:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=SOgkLOjdD4818gaZoCVHy32Nx/QmPm0wmrsfZWbw/ac=; b=Mf/SeYKkus+oM/WBIQva21NiFvFrBFmrHFTahTSyrhAudoN0CX9m11HxA8fmR57kFugHOa beN7lrz9CMcAzpyMIYyQOMOkTvzDbbAP6aWG2T4YrFBHpKjxjsgnWViYj9NtKHJ0kGDue5 3PUsBDEZGTmzNufvnKzj608qB6eR2B3RU6J6Df/Q3yBos01GBN9ioV8yLGxMgi84sBKGUu QphwtvtmNuUyDko9ZqVwEqUFOLLKvFG6fyduN3DdZN/y3Y0lrMIVxVMrue93eV9z09pwD1 STpUBOS6ChF5FqAwGtNa0QsYGnI6XCs4km9cJ4b22emn4FJ8guzF2wfoUaMyaw==
X-Lms-Return-Path: <lba+1678c757d+7ca33c+ietf.org+liangyanrong@ruijie.com.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1e605e7ee3db434cbb0cec138eca82d296247074f23fc4fcbe38ffc04a76"
To: liuyisong@chinamobile.com, spring <spring@ietf.org>
From: 梁艳荣 <liangyanrong@ruijie.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 11:46:05 +0800
Message-Id: <b9493115906f577da9239f0bd304ac13e2f14189.ab583d83.1e2f.403c.a6a0.dc8393b767fa@feishu.cn>
Message-ID-Hash: 7HUZ2MXOROBIGUXVJDTBVK2ZXIA36RET
X-Message-ID-Hash: 7HUZ2MXOROBIGUXVJDTBVK2ZXIA36RET
X-MailFrom: liangyanrong@ruijie.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spring.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection@ietf.org" <draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [spring] Re: Ask SPRING WG for review draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG (SPRING)" <spring.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/9DJXPs6nu3kDb5boWz-0w9b25Rw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spring-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spring-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spring-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Yisong, In my opinion, this draft solves the problems in current practical applications and is meaningful. >From a practical application perspective, it seems that the application scenarios may be further expanded. In addition to latency, jitter, and bandwidth as threshold parameters, additional bandwidth consumption can be considered. For example, an SL composed of 4 SID consumes more bandwidth when forwarding data of the same traffic compared to an SL composed of 3 SID; There are also security factors that can affect CP selection; Suggest supporting user-defined multidimensional measurement methods; Best Regards Yanrong On 12/8/2024 9:37 PM, Yisong Liu wrote: > Dear WG members, > > > With the rise of AI models, new intelligent computing services require > enhanced network reliability, especially in quality-sensitive > scenarios like storage-compute separation and real-time inference. The > draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection offers flexible > path switching for quality degradation, crucial for maintaining > network performance. > > This draft proposed a new mechanism to specify multiple candidate > paths for SR policies, allowing for more sophisticated traffic > engineering. Itsupports dynamic path adjustments based on real-time > network conditions, optimizing resource utilization and ensuring high > service quality. This draft aims to provide network operators with > greater flexibility and control over traffic routing in SR networks. > > > We have just posted a new version. Please see the draft in the > following link: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection/ > > > I hope you can review this draft and share your feedback. Welcome any > questions and comments. > > Best Regards > Yisong on behalf of co-authors > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list --spring@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email tospring-leave@ietf.org