[spring] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-29: (with COMMENT)
Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 19 January 2021 05:26 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: spring@ietf.org
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7743A0D14; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 21:26:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org, Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, jmh@joelhalpern.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.24.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <161103401816.17536.4170780677490936487@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 21:26:58 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/9a7E6Dmk9xXyEeCvELDOOtfYX_0>
Subject: [spring] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-29: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 05:26:59 -0000
Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-29: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [[ questions ]] [ section 8.3 ] * On the bottom of page 18 there's a definition of an IS-IS system-id. draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg has a definition of a system-id as well as an extended-system-id. Should this document reference that document's {extended-,}system-id definitions? I just wonder if this other document is somehow "more authoritative" for this type of thing, and therefore wondering whether referencing it would be the right thing to do.
- [spring] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Erik Kline via Datatracker