Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 19 August 2021 17:17 UTC
Return-Path: <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2693A0DC6 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 10:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1l8cYDeoigim for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 10:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3D393A0DE7 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 10:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id d17so4269104plr.12 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 10:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GAE4nZuhJnb6SnlorIrvl8rY4TyKDJIY94VNUfo24eA=; b=F/9ODr2qyYX6Xd1SbttifIOxmXPHkgWsKgZGQlOBBcxiF6fa4v7QFMTNIGudF4olbi DxI9xhFEhT/ioQXCdzgCivvvXGxqnRxVMUkOrmrup6G7bIbDq4L/uQdjaS+OyFj6Vw/j uKWRrifwKqFy0pt2wzRaW74/0so6EBdXQLur4Ia1zMi6RfFiDKTaNOVQFPu5Ho8ZxMIV WTAmBp7tuMh1wRRFuOmG32vqYdz7Ab9v3ONgxcBSb0xlkNpiiv0kDqw4YhvQnfu1yWW8 qE24Q6JZ0+A6r3tbN80eWcHOvqz//UrWm3kfwCepjr6fpiDqMs2MIULrpjENi5IiUJvO ibmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GAE4nZuhJnb6SnlorIrvl8rY4TyKDJIY94VNUfo24eA=; b=H36AfkWjpBIW2dnJ8U0Qv2fc1vA1R/bkWKOeDoXCn7GKHCg7bTih1IwacNpMhE4QVV YqC1fGt984NZmlZT1kRkAQT8khT+XNm3amqwlTQqf802UOHOojbbYpXOWBG3YkBpN/EL AZsOxaPCWlowllJwi3g5eTs2TTuA1JNkCSzU+jKU9WuN/0gt4LydtKsbLV2vsBvjqR4I UykAMyC3NRpGTqXVKiKq3iUg/MCSY8rO+/9ekRsM2BCZ4dlefRHh3LhKqXRWJyDHCLI3 9F/g97Q+357BC5I4X9+YnxxB9uGbqMrhLBtg1ECh/WNxJ7zn88KDuX+1vgIBvP7MfU1B mu0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530e8kNnAjY6XAE84Ut1sICyzlCY3DzN2FBGRgcOT0elaQ6WZKtc BOfS+wB5/sxXuOWshM3wJR/2DFf8G9vs
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyoVr26qsk5alVc62vvgqE8WxOZMeT/qrJ2Tqc1O+fgD1YjAN1CBDnL9L7Va+ZKVm6GZyTQuw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ac87:b029:12d:3e59:cb7d with SMTP id h7-20020a170902ac87b029012d3e59cb7dmr12604369plr.22.1629393435593; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 10:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:9702:c61:1cfe:3fdb:e546:ab64? ([2601:646:9702:c61:1cfe:3fdb:e546:ab64]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y23sm4226308pfb.130.2021.08.19.10.17.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Aug 2021 10:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 10:17:13 -0700
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B6EEF16F-A75C-4875-9AFF-0F0186FBB335@gmail.com>
References: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.40.0.2.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/ButGBU83gsXOweo_gbLb1Zj9XTo>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 17:17:22 -0000
I support to have only one data plane compressing solution. Having more than one behaviors standardized means that vendors will need to support all the solutions, and before that happens there will be interoperability issues, essentially zero solution. Thanks, Yingzhen > On Aug 4, 2021, at 11:52 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > > The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts on the requirements and analysis drafts. The question of how the working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a separate email a bit later. > > Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and the perspectives being expressed. While the topic was well-raised, the discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to everyone what the purpose is. In particular, the chairs have decided to re-ask the question. We ask that even those who have responded in the discussion respond to this thread. Preferably with both what their opinion is and an explanation of why. > > The question we are asking you to comment on is: > > Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for compressing SRv6 information? > > Please speak up. We are looking to collect responses until close of business PDT on 20-August-2021. > > Thank you, > Joel, Jim, and Bruno > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
- [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 c… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Tony Li
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Keyur Patel
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- [spring] 答复: Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Lihao
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Eduard Metz
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Takuya Miyasaka
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Bernier, Daniel
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Stefano Salsano
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Martin Horneffer
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Boris Hassanov
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Luis M. Contreras
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Aijun Wang
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Ville Hallivuori
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Shunsuke Homma
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… James Guichard
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Ahmed MostafaSaleh ElSawaf
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… gregory.mirsky
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Luc-Fabrice Ndifor Ngwa [ MTN Cameroon ]
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Huaimo Chen
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Loa Andersson
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Sales, Bernard (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Yingzhen Qu
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Satoru Matsushima
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Joel Halpern
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Haoyu Song
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Dirk Steinberg