IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] 6MAN WGLC: draft-ietf-6man-sids

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 26 September 2022 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D91BC14F73F; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 07:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mPvG00RmQW6s; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 07:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24FA7C14F613; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 07:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 28QEWYus009475; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:32:34 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A314604A; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:32:34 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BF546043; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:32:34 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:32:34 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (152.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.152] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 28QEWWaV005859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:32:33 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Acee Lindem (acee)'" <acee@cisco.com>, 'Suresh Krishnan' <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Cc: 'Jen Linkova' <furry13@gmail.com>, '6man' <ipv6@ietf.org>, spring@ietf.org, '6man Chairs' <6man-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6man-sids.authors@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org
References: <CAFU7BARixwPZTrNQOuEw3WP-FqUsVwTj7btMTahcMbXm_NqWGw@mail.gmail.com> <129a313a-d625-dae7-36f6-8541a8aea862@gmail.com> <06eb01d8d038$f0ee3a80$d2caaf80$@olddog.co.uk> <0CF331CA-B40D-49D5-BD01-5CE7C0D42040@gmail.com> <A3E3B288-4446-4FB6-81B3-C13242826ED7@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A3E3B288-4446-4FB6-81B3-C13242826ED7@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:32:33 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <083101d8d1b4$d200dce0$760296a0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0832_01D8D1BD.33C5BA10"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQH9o5ycUyLwhW8Mrgk8iGrHz7QMNQLrhQ+DAkoC2dYBt7266QGyOMwgrWMkuZA=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.152
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27164.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--19.891-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--19.891-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27164.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--19.891400-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 9d2LtCNB3NLxIbpQ8BhdbI61Z+HJnvsO82SgwNf6SK5Tgcg1nzEbBQvf yUsUHxLg8V/wFllq7/MvaeguP86NSCYLU26hJckUqLiIn4tHBVz8555uznRV4BHfiujuTbedjFK /NcS7G4mJtLI5DoIZFksLjY8Hso6t+fCnS6ApknwTuwt1FVoaZ99WrDP4LKdpnSgPkvDdtOgSpK YPHUJnSpCJSqC8FQVQPA1qQZtQo2U5jS4V09dQzlICmG2RRehovO61PPXizymZwdqszN1DlMTr/ G24o7RrqjbqKM7gD/kF8O3PoMprwqXfXkUfELSVw8M8WLzV3UARNp7xD+4vUR0zI+Wuf+4mtZPy UFY5+dAYmbFYWrixJ9kECb6eFouAavaCW5zqiNqzRPQ8T4oe5QWhMWXqiWWyWUtm6AJIkCCkQ2P +cxA/K4A+zZbAFdrSTmAgw3rBkJd84NioK/AIQZ4CIKY/Hg3AaZGo0EeYG97UHQeTVDUrIj166J h7ejx4Smt+SIH36f9q8/xv2Um1aiUIayx+Skid
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/DWRof5inwrHTkQLlKXaVhNNBeVw>
Subject: Re: [spring] 6MAN WGLC: draft-ietf-6man-sids
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:32:48 -0000

Thanks, Acee.

 

The reason you cite may not be perfect, but your advice is. I shall suppress my urges.

 

Adrian

 


4.

  A node
  taking part in this mechanism accomplishes this by using the ARG part
  [RFC8986] of the Destination address field of the IPv6 header to come
  up with a new Destination address in some of these flavors.

"to come up with" and "flavors" are a bit colloquial. Maybe say 
"derive" and "mechanisms".

 

Ack on the “derive” part, but “flavor” is a specific term used in [I-D.ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression]

 

Actually, this “flavor” terminology was adopted in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8986/. I’ve also never been a fan but have suppressed the urge to request changes in LSR documents due to its usage in the base SRv6 Network Programming document.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email