IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6.

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 06 September 2019 11:01 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33981200E3 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 04:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gm40_5_6Su4P for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 04:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B493E120B49 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 04:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id s18so5211263qkj.3 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 04:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HNctvYE2NQYkZq4N2Nhev2gO1D9x7n9rPFCq6vku9zs=; b=dVqDbBCH4nCIsjWDjwwXwuGSx1X616IwxpPed0GbiA/7rGiQBYIQ5n2DnCXyAU6AI5 sIwIAKe/1FqGKaU7yeYohczB2UL/d3cKJADU8m9m6/mMmOPrBb6k1vEaS9uMBZkew5Pc y2awmDps6KD6pXNPiMMXfvQTL2KBSPna/OOON2ge15wP4GB+jjmmEcs1CCkbLwdj8t4Z HEgW7Osm/yXdZp8BKJ0Bw+BqhewoxwslKDaH5GBAE0HGd/XLTlYZYNVrKqXAi3ONEiII CPxG+/y3XTfabVZ0nqmT6GHjUO0SBKu+qqQzAFluLTCzVOcgS7J+ITNKjZYaY6uu8cfK Kz/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HNctvYE2NQYkZq4N2Nhev2gO1D9x7n9rPFCq6vku9zs=; b=GWtz9fjtMNADMjHkOg2yTJ+xxJL9+VeRmrsWA+O9V928lhqgw7VcVWymfO+oZaPu0q o2TSPCBgZtWMi7pOG/AAGV9hIg1jrXH6X8uVRQpnFM5j2F0NmrrPeucyuKytDFt+LAH/ INox0q9fzDzmc/MsvTxNWNC07sl3w0oGBMlSYUxJlIzw+VNByMn2zo0kra7EiUka0uIw 1EhJ6VoqHpym7mXfDGlMItia4btYNboA8z/5myXER9VOlEvvGsK2CAEJvT2yyZGUTEd3 BAzQR/2UyGHTsCSWKEKLmNs40y2fLHXcNryO+2auZo+waR26R12Rj/cQMY2wjMmyiiUV Y8eA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXilDRDSLO6nJaoSSFJhTJI+4IqUWKNTjcWizQKnM7PUmFXtgi2 w38wymOxoQvh+wVactj6cB5np8RXe0Q2bI38C5ixnw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzMOJvl4p8l3+NIaHGwaztqfutkyHAW2PFRw2ogXq3vRrBo5uJxKzTV8VwIm2AbkopWpOy961XAJxX/rneLYcI=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:2784:: with SMTP id n126mr7738455qkn.302.1567767699561; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 04:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHd-QWtA21+2Sm616Fnw0D-eB7SNb_BeG8-A-MCLLFgTwSpOsg@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR05MB54632F09C712ADB30138CFA9AEBE0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR19MB3415D21403394F8129A4BAD8FCB90@BYAPR19MB3415.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <30491F13-C652-45C3-AB2B-95F765FBB4EA@juniper.net> <65C5CB04-3A2F-4F83-A7C8-2045154F93AE@cisco.com> <BYAPR05MB5463EC3250F2A303A3641839AEBA0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <91CBADAD-EFE6-46E1-A9D3-DAA111357179@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <91CBADAD-EFE6-46E1-A9D3-DAA111357179@juniper.net>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 13:01:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMGyUFRPDqCBo5SbLX486o_9GLpM6Zxf8KSt1voWiqhkGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Srihari Sangli <ssangli=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, Rob Shakir <robjs@google.com>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d2b0660591e05c8d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Dxq9pA4fZTDt1Fhj394I86UHKlg>
Subject: Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6.
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 11:01:51 -0000

Not really. Only SR OAM packets may need it. Is that a real problem ?

Best
R

On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 11:41 Srihari Sangli <ssangli=
40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Zafar,
>
>
>
> ·         The original segment list is maintained by using the
> non-Reduced flavor (in which case the SID list is fully preserved in the
> SRH).
>
>
>
> [RB] At the cost of encoding efficiency. 50% decrease !!
>
>
>
> If I understand it right, the IPv6 packet carrying uSIDs will also have
> full set SID carried in the SRH. The full SID list in SRH is to provide
> additional information ? Pls let me know if I got it right. Thanks.
>
>
>
> srhari…
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email