From nobody Mon Nov 2 01:25:45 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1825D3A0C94; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 01:25:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.898 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9bsWj3AoP-Mi; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 01:25:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FE93A0B9D; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 01:25:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.19]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app10-12010 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eea5f9fd08946c-73935; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:25:29 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea5f9fd08946c-73935 X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from cmcc (unknown[10.2.53.146]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr10-12010 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eea5f9fd087486-18c30; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:25:29 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea5f9fd087486-18c30 From: "Weiqiang Cheng" To: "'James Guichard'" , Cc: , References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 17:25:27 +0800 Message-ID: <086801d6b0fa$1a219790$4e64c6b0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0869_01D6B13D.2844D790" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Adaoaxv73543NQYjR7aQ9fY490xJIQIjskOA Content-Language: zh-cn Archived-At: Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03 X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 09:25:44 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0869_01D6B13D.2844D790 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I support the adoption. =20 =B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] =B4=FA=B1=ED = James Guichard =B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2020=C4=EA10=D4=C222=C8=D5 20:52 =CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: spring@ietf.org =B3=AD=CB=CD: ippm-chairs@ietf.org; spring-chairs@ietf.org =D6=F7=CC=E2: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03 =20 Dear WG: =20 This message starts a 3 week WG adoption call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03, ending November 12th 2020. Please note that this document has several changes = from v-02 that were requested by the SPRING and IPPM chairs. For this reason, = the chairs have extended the adoption call for an additional week to allow = the WG enough time to review these changes before deciding on WG adoption. =20 Some background: =20 =20 Several review comments were received previously for document = https://tools. ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02. The SPRING and IPPM = chairs considered those comments, and upon review of this version of the = document, determined the following: =20 * The SPRING document should describe only the procedures relevant to SPRING with pointers to non-SPRING document/s that define any = extensions. Several extensions including Control Code Field Extension for STAMP Messages, Loss Measurement Query Message Extensions, Loss Measurement Response Message Extensions, Node Address TLV Extensions, and Return = Path TLV Extensions were included in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02 and should = be removed from the SPRING document. * The STAMP extensions included in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02 should be described in a new document published in the IPPM WG. =20 =20 These conclusions were discussed with the authors of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02 the result = of which is the publication of the following two documents: =20 * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03. The subject of this WG adoption call. * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-00. This document will be progressed (if determined by the WG) within the IPPM = WG. =20 After review of the SPRING document please indicate support (or not) for = WG adoption to the mailing list. Please also provide comments/reasons for = that support (or lack thereof) as silence will not be considered as consent. =20 Finally, the chairs would like to thank the authors for their efforts in this matter. =20 Thanks! =20 Jim, Bruno, & Joel ------=_NextPart_000_0869_01D6B13D.2844D790 Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I support the = adoption.

 

=B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: spring = [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] =B4=FA=B1=ED = James = Guichard
=B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2020=C4=EA10=D4=C222=C8=D5 20:52
=CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: = spring@ietf.org
=B3=AD=CB=CD: ippm-chairs@ietf.org; = spring-chairs@ietf.org
=D6=F7=CC=E2: [spring] WG Adoption Call = for = https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03<= /span>

 

Dear WG:

 

This message starts a 3 week WG adoption call for ht= tps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03, ending = November 12th 2020. Please note that this document has = several changes from v-02 that were requested by the SPRING and IPPM = chairs. For this reason, the chairs have extended the adoption call for = an additional week to allow the WG enough time to review these changes = before deciding on WG adoption.

 

Some background: =  

 

Several review comments were received previously for = document ht= tps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02. = The SPRING and IPPM chairs considered those = comments, and upon review of this version of the document, determined = the following:

 

  • The SPRING document should describe only the = procedures relevant to SPRING with pointers to non-SPRING document/s = that define any extensions. Several extensions including Control Code Field Extension for STAMP Messages, Loss Measurement Query Message = Extensions, Loss Measurement Response Message = Extensions, Node Address TLV Extensions, = and Return Path TLV Extensions = were included in ht= tps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02 and = should be removed from the SPRING document.
  • The STAMP = extensions included in ht= tps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02 = should be described in a new document = published in the IPPM WG.  

 

These conclusions were discussed = with the authors of ht= tps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02 the = result of which is the publication of the following two = documents:

 

 

After review of the SPRING document please indicate support = (or not) for WG adoption to the mailing list. Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or = lack thereof) as silence will not be considered as = consent.

 

Finally, the chairs would like to thank the authors for = their efforts in this matter.

 

Thanks!

 

Jim, Bruno, & Joel

------=_NextPart_000_0869_01D6B13D.2844D790--