IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law (was: Question about SRv6 Insert function)

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Thu, 05 September 2019 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43403120232; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DrcM55eOvBak; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00D5C120130; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a01:79c:cebd:c078:596c:c2c1:6749:79a7] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:79c:cebd:c078:596c:c2c1:6749:79a7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A5B84E11AC6; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 21:58:40 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 23:58:37 +0200
Message-Id: <3D8725E7-EAA3-4615-ABA2-FFA53D2F1B14@employees.org>
References: <ca6e7a10-1b84-445f-053d-8a666ab4ec90@si6networks.com>
Cc: Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <ca6e7a10-1b84-445f-053d-8a666ab4ec90@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A5821e)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Ee1FEmei17afmRiQ1uWrD0tEE1E>
Subject: Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law (was: Question about SRv6 Insert function)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 21:58:42 -0000

Fernando,


> On 5 Sep 2019, at 21:54, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> 
> On 5/9/19 22:30, Ole Troan wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>> On 5 Sep 2019, at 21:03, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We have wasted way too much time and energy with all the methafores and
>>> curious interpretations of standards by folks pushing and/or supporting
>>> EH insertion, really.
>> 
>> Pot calling kettle black?
> 
> Not really.
> 
> Since this whole EH-insertion debate started, it has all been about
> pushing it forward no matter what.
> 
> The spec is clear. If you want to change it, make a strong case for it.
> BUt do not try to circumvent the IETF consensus on the topic.

Straw man attack. 

I think you have repeatedly made your point. 

O.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email