Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call
stefano previdi <stefano@previdi.net> Mon, 06 January 2020 08:27 UTC
Return-Path: <stefano@previdi.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FD71200B3 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 00:27:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=previdi-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D1QjEv7u0eEt for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 00:27:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C2BF120098 for <spring@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 00:27:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id t2so48667889wrr.1 for <spring@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:27:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=previdi-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YzYCdsMGFZ5MC3J2YgP2UJGQmVDXX6HkOnGLDyxvSAU=; b=tb7gJBsogBoOrDPnE5KmCdaldwYuU9pCEf6xVgUrl5DS+2oHMId8hydvPCGY6HpysI 1iSRDXruel0UdHNGRmcxMPNxZxnzwiF2A3zbJALGbupNu3TpTzGxHRukMHFhu4cyPEik 0Hv2ZHx9UOW5yCNbcRseXGzZIcKv5fYcsQRam5jp/25/X692pXAUIt5UhN7zjFqu17dl wxxY3lvhxx84qPQKipjncRP+1AuaZzpwas8dEA7sjjMoZKRmW7e4vfLnOP8YtB95jDE1 m6wvNJKT/WL6wse2GmP9GpGCU+GQaFLAqCiZtkMElgBBIG0YKCU6O9Nqc+p9VyWCVJM7 moHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YzYCdsMGFZ5MC3J2YgP2UJGQmVDXX6HkOnGLDyxvSAU=; b=c8rwhll4GD6xshNYBFCOOCPZC5KtyIUw6xfPIz5J1OvIHcuBYpQeXz9loKBfkytmae 2E2dDtwieojGA3zkSuGJJyHXVClAHtqzcCpYd1QJryZPhXGW+TM5E7py9A7XxEcWW8nH Ug5oNdSQ+s58mxwebtUo7cFAAbefQOtlpjVnTJfQmDD7+e1NFNp1U0N84QkR2e4wkBBE gIfUQulq0M2Nm6gcxG0Xa3LUB5/KF1pNN8Rw8k/0NlLlfAgKo+PDNpxhKoS62vE488No 7V8u9F0E/Y/gJDkvbUTjT7yfQ1GlDL/WdAvcoR0FbWifylSr91olUFhFL/Mfjl6puQj+ PZuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX7wpa4MW8wZ6TcHuBmO/C2LlymYwLM6UacqlGn6MOpNjkBIjsh PC+WlMS7J718gGPXvdKypm+yQQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyv1YDtnIaZ67o5Q6+mmkQd8Aa3986GY7D460vjvQo4HQsNqCnzIduFarWDIr/MS1/dAXhktg==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6211:: with SMTP id y17mr101223640wru.344.1578299226553; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:27:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (net-5-95-15-200.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [5.95.15.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z123sm22450221wme.18.2020.01.06.00.27.05 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:27:05 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: stefano previdi <stefano@previdi.net>
In-Reply-To: <18437_1576774434_5DFBAB22_18437_317_31_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48D392D1@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 09:27:31 +0100
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9129F9CB-0564-4A34-8338-86F84562AD1C@previdi.net>
References: <18437_1576774434_5DFBAB22_18437_317_31_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48D392D1@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/ElkEvosz3LeOmFjTN8TXakJWHbs>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 08:27:11 -0000
support. s. > On Dec 19, 2019, at 5:53 PM, bruno.decraene@orange.com wrote: > > Hi SPRING WG, > > This begins a 2 week Early Allocation call for a “Ethernet” value from the "Protocol Numbers" registry. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-07#section-9.1 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-07#section-5.3 > https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml > > In parallel of the Working Group Last Call which is currently running, the authors are requesting for early code point allocation from IANA as implementations are under way. > > The criteria for early allocation are: > a. The code points must be from a space designated as "RFC > Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action". Additionally, > requests for early assignment of code points from a > "Specification Required" registry are allowed if the > specification will be published as an RFC. > > b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to > handling the protocol entities defined by the code points > (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described > in an Internet-Draft. > > c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if > there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later > specifications must be seamlessly interoperable. > > d. The Working Group chairs and Area Directors (ADs) judge that > there is sufficient interest in the community for early (pre-RFC) > implementation and deployment, or that failure to make an early > allocation might lead to contention for the code point in the > field. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7120#section-2 > > I believe the above conditions are met. (minus the AD judgement which is further down in the process) > > As a reminder, this topic has mainly been discussed following IETF 105 (Montréal) both during the meeting and on the mailing list. > During IETF 106 it has been discussed in the IntArea WG. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/proceedings#intarea > > Note that this code point is not to be specific to SRv6. Depending on AD guidance, this specific code point even be moved from draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming into a specific 1 page draft. > > If you support early adoption, please include “support” along with any comments about the draft’s technical solution. > > If you do not support early allocation, please include “no support” in your email and indicate why. > > Thank you, > --Bruno > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Dirk Steinberg
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Ahmed Bashandy
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Kamran Raza (skraza)
- [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programmi… bruno.decraene
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Francois Clad (fclad)
- [spring] 答复: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Lizhenbin
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Huzhibo
- Re: [spring] 答复: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-p… Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Mach Chen
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… James Guichard
- [spring] FW: RE: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-p… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… john leddy.net
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Gaurav Dawra
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Satoru Matsushima
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Ahmed Abdelsalam (ahabdels)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… stefano previdi
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Bernier, Daniel
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… bruno.decraene
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… bruno.decraene
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Loa Andersson
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… bruno.decraene