From jmh@joelhalpern.com Thu Apr 11 11:14:37 2024 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED42BC151075; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:14:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OmdbVf647skG; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3CC9C15108E; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VFnsP3T6Yz6H6Ny; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:14:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1712859273; bh=iUHO6CFugh0eIAtWzV9+ALrd/h1ed8zzyjNu7uq8KjE=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=MU90MK8QTYQdotv7+JnFc53WdDfnpjoJsijJwmIVJB5MkaLq7rJzwgav3ov5AY151 ne1a+sGhlVbKPD9Yb+uVdCRPQW9gwaRvFdHAKhy+Lp4sEcvzvjRIf2KkndY/qel6Ua gyg8EqyltyxCQSJvta+nVSVfvgtaBrgHlPNw+GVE= X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net Received: from [192.168.22.20] (unknown [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4VFnsN6nNzz6G9lD; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:14:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Joel Halpern To: SPRING WG List Cc: "spring-chairs@ietf.org" Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: [spring] Resolution of threads regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:14:38 -0000 The chairs have observed and appreciated the discussion of the questions that have been raised regarding the spring compression draft. We believe the discussion has run its useful course.  Based on the discussion, we are asking for one clarification to be added to the draft.  Following that, we will notify the SPRING WG of what questions we are sending to the 6man working group. The clarification we ask is to add text noting that the revision to the procedures for generating checksums for packets with a compressed container as the ultimate DA (with or without an SRH) is likely to require that the code paths using such destinations will need to turn off checksum offload. Editors, can you please produce a revision with that change and any other edits you have queued? Thank you, Joel and Alvaro