[spring] 答复: Results of SR compression analysis?

"Yangfan (IP Standard)" <shirley.yangfan@huawei.com> Thu, 11 March 2021 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <shirley.yangfan@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55AA3A1669 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:42:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ndNn9XmQMLjr for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:42:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D13773A1666 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:42:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml741-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown []) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DxGPN125qz67xfQ for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 01:38:00 +0800 (CST)
Received: from nkgeml703-chm.china.huawei.com ( by fraeml741-chm.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:42:25 +0100
Received: from nkgeml701-chm.china.huawei.com ( by nkgeml703-chm.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 01:42:23 +0800
Received: from nkgeml701-chm.china.huawei.com ([]) by nkgeml701-chm.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 01:42:23 +0800
From: "Yangfan (IP Standard)" <shirley.yangfan@huawei.com>
To: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Results of SR compression analysis?
Thread-Index: AdcV0PMJyKp7tY42RwaZwoF8RpRyAQAE/RHIAAAZ6SQALRAYoA==
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:42:23 +0000
Message-ID: <bc43da4b850442c49c6e64a0425d53fc@huawei.com>
References: <cb87ac70d5a248b9a2267631ac610b14@huawei.com>, <BN6PR11MB4081096A7E1EB34C72F10C56C8919@BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BN6PR11MB40812868F95394B54DBA1B1EC8919@BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR11MB40812868F95394B54DBA1B1EC8919@BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_bc43da4b850442c49c6e64a0425d53fchuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/FocDe9MTs2KfTS-N-qAfCrdcp2w>
Subject: [spring] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogUmVzdWx0cyBvZiBTUiBjb21wcmVzc2lvbiBh?= =?gb2312?b?bmFseXNpcz8=?=
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:42:30 -0000

Hi Darren,

Many thanks for fixing the link. Now I can follow the link to figure out the progress.
Good luck to DT with further work!


发件人: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Darren Dukes (ddukes)
发送时间: 2021年3月11日 3:44
收件人: Yangfan (IP Standard) <shirley.yangfan@huawei.com>om>; spring@ietf.org
主题: Re: [spring] Results of SR compression analysis?

(hit send too soon)
We should now work toward the targets Weiqiang mentioned during the meeting for an April/May submission of the analysis text.


On 2021-03-10, 2:40 PM, "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com<mailto:ddukes@cisco.com>> wrote:

Hi Fan, I fixed the link in the minutes.
  Thanks for drawing that to our attention.
That analysis was done on Feb 11 but the design team decided not to review and submit any of its content (except for the structure) before the Feb 22 cutoff.

We should

On 2021-03-10, 12:18 PM, "spring" <spring-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org>> wrote:


First of all, I really appreciate the SR compression design team for their hard work.
But I found out the analysis results are empty in the analysis draft[1] as Xuesong pointed out at the meeting.

I tried to get the answer of why this is empty from the meeting minutes(https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-110-spring), and it seems that this has been discussed but the link in the minutes cannot work now. So anyone help?

Again, thanks to the contributions and looking forward to the results in the near future.

Best regards,

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis-00