IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Automated Disclaimers (RE: Request to close )

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 02 March 2020 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855DE3A109D; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:15:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Pz_PZgfJ7Nz; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:15:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B983A10A2; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:15:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.81.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 022KFX0C024323 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:15:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1583180146; x=1583266546; i=@elandsys.com; bh=zakz4g7ZjUgwrFd5zNIneZqJnmrs9aEbe5vWs9cdMME=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=nPzNeNsdTnYU5bBnzom2JM4q4jPrIwzy/Bj6B6gqbalb+7iOIdOGNVS3ZYEqAyoIr HoDup3KBJXn3Qga7Mig/SnCSflSV55EMPtPUx2VQcX2gnwg/La6Zp56jhcjwGCh/YE b7WZ8ElFLojGrN7wMvykOkinFUepZtVdxjb3DlAc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200302112018.0c0701d0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 12:10:47 -0800
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: spring@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsyzHuw2ETt7mko45z8DqoZ4USFk9hT_veer7tgYjLSrvg@mail.g mail.com>
References: <F88E3F76-DD4B-4807-A458-85FABFF20D96@gmail.com> <5D218BFB-0D6F-4F7D-858F-B571A67DC47F@leddy.net> <CAHw9_iJ_ipEvU0NUx44XbK0_DrLe_GRw6G=m+chK4wZcRP8BMg@mail.gmail.com> <ACA082A4-BC78-4C63-9F91-5C9A44F47642@cisco.com> <b693c244-95f9-473e-de21-166393280d18@gmail.com> <CAHw9_iL6oM73JnSU1QL0+PRohSH6sEskD=enH7QsPrWiUfStDg@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200227113437.10ad6088@elandnews.com> <23106_1582880310_5E58D636_23106_323_2_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DC9786@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <6.2.5.6.2.20200228011557.0bd1a0b0@elandnews.com> <27033_1583153322_5E5D00AA_27033_129_3_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DD4DC2@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup><6.2.5.6.2.20200302082710.0b997868@elandnews.com> <20881_1583169286_5E5D3F06_20881_200_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DD5D9C@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup><6.2.5.6.2.20200302092008.0bf948e0@elandnews.com> <17098_1583172404_5E5D4B34_17098_153_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DD5F63@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <6.2.5.6.2.20200302101029.0c17eae0@elandnews.com> <CAMMESsyzHuw2ETt7mko45z8DqoZ4USFk9hT_veer7tgYjLSrvg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/FyhizMCkf6AS8egu7hA3yDJ20HU>
Subject: Re: [spring] Automated Disclaimers (RE: Request to close )
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 20:15:55 -0000

Hi Alvaro,
At 11:09 AM 02-03-2020, Alvaro Retana wrote:
>[Changed the subject to better reflect the topic and for easier tracking.]

Thanks.

>Hi!  How are you?

I am okay.

>I looked at BCP 9, but didn't find anything related to your question.
>If I missed it, please point me in the right direction.  I think you
>may be referring to BCP 78.

Sorry for not being clear.  The process as defined in BCP 9 is 
expected to be transparent.  There is also a statement about 
"transparent operation".

>Note that this section is clearly only talking about statements in a
>Contribution (I pasted the definition of "Contribution" below, from
>the same RFC).

BCP 78 is about the IPR aspects and, as you pointed out, a 
"Contribution".  I prefer not to ask questions about the latter as I 
have participated in the discussions about the relevant RFC and I can 
guess what the persons who participated in the discussions would say.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email