[spring] Fw:New Version Notification fordraft-lz-lsr-igp-sr-service-segments-00.txt
<liu.yao71@zte.com.cn> Sun, 19 January 2020 08:54 UTC
Return-Path: <liu.yao71@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156CB1200B1; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 00:54:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33duTQC0MXvJ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 00:54:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B63A120059; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 00:54:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.164.217]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 1207566F071FF46CD988; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 16:54:27 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.239]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id E8AE575B3C598ED59A80; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 16:54:26 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp05.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.204]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 00J8sC4N052668; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 16:54:12 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from liu.yao71@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp04[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 16:54:11 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 16:54:11 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afc5e241933087fab9f
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202001191654113563416@zte.com.cn>
References: 157913825311.22476.3294252337224291370.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: liu.yao71@zte.com.cn
To: spring@ietf.org, sfc@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 00J8sC4N052668
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Gc5S7lHE5iozWhMIdBQRn7zpCJ4>
Subject: [spring] Fw:New Version Notification fordraft-lz-lsr-igp-sr-service-segments-00.txt
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 08:54:34 -0000
Dear All, We have published a new draft https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lz-lsr-igp-sr-service-segments-00 that discusses the IGP extensions for SR service segments in SFC. Comments, suggestions and questions are more than welcome. Cheers, YAO 原始邮件 发件人：internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> 收件人：Zheng Zhang <zzhang_ietf@hotmail.com>;刘尧00165286; 日 期 ：2020年01月16日 09:30 主 题 ：New Version Notification fordraft-lz-lsr-igp-sr-service-segments-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-lz-lsr-igp-sr-service-segments-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Liu Yao and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-lz-lsr-igp-sr-service-segments Revision: 00 Title: IGP Extentions for Segment Routing Service Segment Document date: 2020-01-15 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 7 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lz-lsr-igp-sr-service-segments-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lz-lsr-igp-sr-service-segments/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lz-lsr-igp-sr-service-segments-00 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lz-lsr-igp-sr-service-segments Abstract: This document defines extensions to the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF) in order to carry service segment information via IGP. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat