Re: [spring] 64-bit locators

Miya Kohno <miya.kohno@gmail.com> Sun, 29 December 2019 05:00 UTC

Return-Path: <miya.kohno@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671D1120086 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 21:00:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fmF_NK1qBbHC for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 21:00:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FDEB120018 for <spring@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 21:00:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id j1so23010067lja.2 for <spring@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 21:00:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZKmoClkGr107g+iAj99WLsNAth5lLG24lEYcl1LrXDM=; b=FfmmxIiQ4cKc8NOYUUgccWPYWzyc4JJHJxXLq0OCtLu7WOZMZybgSdmzspvtnw5R5a jpX9UD2HdkzBx7InB/NhJsHTPkW1xr0fCxI/IDjVysPMi9USK/02WtL5Axf7SJRc4xXH QvFd8NJGTGMPGd/Fe/4Zuc7vUFyHsMu9eKX4QPNJ9uZ/q1641ELOHVfA1hkkQV5NRgEX rwOZ2JXs90edBMinTf96m9V2E6K2L6SsOWvXrqvwB43DXpvU4qjbXIQoFb7CTSh3S3DO s/AEUOILI/veqWIU6RJMQekDGdFpilJ7sgFYZqoyQshky63jwz+HEIjDEVx4J379iW+b aVSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZKmoClkGr107g+iAj99WLsNAth5lLG24lEYcl1LrXDM=; b=SZPISStCuyVS1OkNoGb/zzF82Vu5Z5N+TJY/3Gb+gAq5H1iYoU+QO8hVY/49TAt252 4MGo9h0SO6iu29LJgK0GgxVtw1pp0S8PnQc/pkUzgqgigs8Izk3dU+eidBkAAcgp1XJY oY7Oz23lEvp5b/Q1kx7uidD8XIAM4NoPZiPeFpUQNUKOv5pFfKUT+v5Ho34rxLTaggqb Xn04FQoWAFlFcY3gCH/Cf/fWT+VCq3SdDwtCcSS/Wfh30df8VHH9jsXSWIv5oQ58qBn+ Y68F2ttBnYpgNXnyOHdbNYiifCr5ZdRzTvVSJN25Za5GVVs1aAZU0ZEhN/94yQ5yklBs ueRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/2lQ2YKZ+CoH5lt3SjB0tEHWSU2rS61NQEpxqqCx8pCWvFfv1 K5ww29rBM/Kl+WQjmeGzxMm/k3jWI4iPIgmA6EY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyMvxxtQ8/wD0LEsvhOut4qj2FjzkqiaVx7pT69Vn7/TvpNvdVCoxi1fU0UI9EAzX2wd0HfEOkmBVfkhaFjhD8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:2046:: with SMTP id t6mr21193119ljo.180.1577595633525; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 21:00:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BN7PR05MB5699D85CC99CB23B1B573901AE530@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAO42Z2yAH4ECeB+PGRS98HgZHXtTq3iX1x6aMSPjKgS6O1GDAQ@mail.gmail.com> <8f5607c9-645a-ea88-e2a7-a4bed8206fc8@gmail.com> <63F5AA66-AEF8-4278-B98C-D3C53AC5A60A@cisco.com> <CAO42Z2x-5NUYHAzjBAR3je7EoPde=-autOXyta5EvqDydbVMWA@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV1xZEx6_eZpdgvWAmiopXT-SACR1DM_KSeF_JSDvgSSOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMGSbdL2ZP-_uX_464Tov7MV0vu=cmoKpw71-vL8R4HpRw@mail.gmail.com> <069e6021-537c-422a-37da-f090a6ac334b@gmail.com> <DBBPR03MB5415CDB6870E8E6B69522E40EE2D0@DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHOqJWo+ofewx5LF81zA7sGNGwdBgh3X1CSujZbTw9TCw@mail.gmail.com> <DBBPR03MB54156546800063A85AF17591EE2D0@DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHbqFCR9jZDrTHTy00MQTWEP30Zm6PhZtNriFW99edORw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMHbqFCR9jZDrTHTy00MQTWEP30Zm6PhZtNriFW99edORw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miya Kohno <miya.kohno@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:00:23 +0900
Message-ID: <CAG99tekBNS1b17tpAEBegT7OzjCyMHVvZuyBGF4JB-Z8uwfOFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000055e8c1059ad09bdd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/HKVs7fhnkJ-lUGPsEoIJVIwHHw0>
Subject: Re: [spring] 64-bit locators
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 05:00:37 -0000

Also rfc6164 (and rfc6547)..

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 12:57 AM Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:

>
>
>> Therefore – this redefines the address semantics – and that – should be
>> accompanied by an update to said drafts to avoid confusion and to avoid
>> potential future complications
>>
>
> Please observe that we have a lot of IETF documents putting various stuff
> into IPv6 128 bits. Take rfc7599 as an easy example. Where do you see
> anyone in IETF requested to update IPv6 base specs when any of such
> documents were going via standards track ?
>
> Cheers,
> R.
>
>> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>