IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] New drafts from SRCOMP design team

Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Tue, 02 March 2021 05:28 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC86A3A112D; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 21:28:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p_FaRApYQF6r; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 21:27:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D533A112E; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 21:27:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.13]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app08-12008 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee8603dccc95ba-85a67; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 13:27:37 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee8603dccc95ba-85a67
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc (unknown[10.1.6.7]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee7603dccc84d2-00ea4; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 13:27:37 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee7603dccc84d2-00ea4
From: "Weiqiang Cheng" <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: "'Rishabh Parekh'" <rishabhp@gmail.com>
Cc: <srcomp@ietf.org>, "'SPRING WG List'" <spring@ietf.org>
References: <05ce01d70b9a$f1c38230$d54a8690$@com> <CABjMoXYSiHbgNeXJExXiANhDtrw8h5i77+LyzBxLMF1GqpseFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABjMoXYSiHbgNeXJExXiANhDtrw8h5i77+LyzBxLMF1GqpseFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 13:27:36 +0800
Message-ID: <0a2901d70f24$c15fcf80$441f6e80$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0A2A_01D70F67.CF830F80"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdcMZ90FEHKkOzCFSRWP59Dkpt775QCvDpew
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/IHDuCx1HikfmwsXldkJqJ1sdF6g>
Subject: Re: [spring] New drafts from SRCOMP design team
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 05:28:01 -0000

Hi Rishabh,

Thanks for your comments.

It is good point, and DT will consider the it in.

 

B.R.

Weiqiang Cheng

 

发件人: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Rishabh Parekh
发送时间: 2021年2月27日 01:50
收件人: Weiqiang Cheng
抄送: srcomp@ietf.org; SPRING WG List
主题: Re: [spring] New drafts from SRCOMP design team

 

Weiqiang,

Text quoted below from the SPRING charter indirectly covers Point-to-Multipoint requirement which is addressed by SR Replication Segment draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment/

New types of segments mapping to forwarding behaviour (e.g., local
ingress replication, local forwarding resources, a pre-existing
replication structure) if needed for new usages.

For the Point-to-Multipoint compression requirement, what exactly is "multicast address" in the Metric? Is this an IPv6 multicast address? If so, it really does not conform to SRv6 data plane. 

 

I would rather consider the SRv6 Replication SID, described in the latest version of SR Replication segment draft, to be the Metric for measuring P2MP requirement. Maybe we should also consider adding it to SRv6 Functionality Section 4.2.1 of the compression requirements draft.

 

-Rishabh

 

 

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 9:25 AM Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> wrote:

Hi All,

Two drafts have been submitted.  Please review them and any comments are welcomed.

 

Compression requirement draft -04 version provided two more requirements: 

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-04.txt

 

Compression analysis draft -00 provided a skeleton for the analysis of 4 candidate proposals.

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis-00.txt

 

B.R.

Weiqiang

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email