IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase-09

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Tue, 12 December 2017 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572C61294B9; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:57:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yf3aOESNsnpI; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:57:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9050F1200FC; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:57:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6202; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513097857; x=1514307457; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=2/XfC+C52t7km8eThN+2DP607S+2h0/Wy8EXhYwLYEU=; b=eBBo+IFiyVAYYST1ImMdzy+rbFndutOaTu+dvZxuY1FJLHf/aLIeRXZi eQicKuoAimbv/NrZ8zij0zbbyGo8EIGj6CC2MBdQFPrE95WvA6c655SVt A7ZEcPuaQQClZ64NbVLg2P+a5n49Vbl8quR9/8iXglvjsuEw+q/omhz76 E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A7AQBeCTBa/4YNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM+gVonB4N7iiGPAoFXkWqFTYIVCoU7AhqEbj8YAQEBAQEBAQEBayiFJAYjVhACAQgEOwMCAgIwFBECBA4FiURkqHSCJ4pwAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYNjgguBVoISC4J3gy+FAzGCMgWZTolJAotqiTqTZ5Y3AhEZAYE6AR85gU5vFWQBgX6EVXiJNIEVAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,395,1508803200"; d="scan'208,217";a="329666205"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 12 Dec 2017 16:57:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (xch-rtp-020.cisco.com [64.101.220.160]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBCGvacQ010370 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:57:36 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:57:31 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:57:31 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
CC: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase-09
Thread-Index: AQHTcx4k3EKWUeYSf0GdAt9DucmAw6NAQi6A
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:57:31 +0000
Message-ID: <118B351A-C23E-4888-B015-44741AE11FD1@cisco.com>
References: <151306513713.20438.3742368041842215985@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151306513713.20438.3742368041842215985@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.116.133]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_118B351AC23E4888B01544741AE11FD1ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/It80A_eLOmh_J01efPedMhU7j8c>
Subject: Re: [spring] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase-09
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:57:39 -0000

Many thanks Takeshi for your review! We will fix the minor and editorial comments.

Thanks!

—
Carlos Pignataro, carlos@cisco.com<mailto:carlos@cisco.com>

“Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound more photosynthesis."

On Dec 12, 2017, at 2:52 AM, Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp<mailto:takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>> wrote:

Reviewer: Takeshi Takahashi
Review result: Has Nits

The issues I have here are very minor.
The security consideration section became better than the 06 version that I
have reviewed before, but I hope the editors could be kind enough to help
reader understand security situation better.

Minor comments:

Regarding this sentence "but it can be used to compromse security in the cse of
external IP domains", what do you mean by "compromise security"? It would be
nice if you could describe what kind of security compromise may happen in order
for the readers to understand the threats more vividly.

Editorial comments:

1. LDP had better be spelled out.
2. "skilled personal": could it be "skilled personnel"?
3. This sentence "As it is necessary to know that the information is
  stale is order to follow the instruction, as is the case with for
  example convergence events that may be ongoing at the time of
  diagnostic measurement." is not easy to understand ofr me. I see some typo
  in this sentence as well.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email