Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 04 August 2021 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4A03A09FC for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id esNczHgApmpq for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75B4B3A09FB for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id b6so6603539lff.10 for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 13:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VbKRGFtApKeoCSRJtcYhOPqxGpb7lCDKQa5iooCLw4Q=; b=LOT6YNMeNHJ7VGVqz8zRAWEATYG3cqn/4ZK/uBPnszDT/hTe5giGHMuwR72XbhGs+j RXX0P4CYqujHRdCwGdmgQtP5Q6tLJBJXSRpZJWHnWosslV1xEIuuYg5PSrrGKouBrlg7 +8kQJGm9lKo8nOq8IgU6D1V39l7A/wYwjFk++4ltgQu+bIsr7KhqFcm/kQ/DMFMaHVwh ch1A1zm+brEfDDpPSSY8cC3Tu5KsdvUSU5eCQqREK7ouBgXCH/YPTtkb9sjuMKx86mvi nnGdNQRI8vnv8KZu97NhWbMJMkpRHPIvSEqvNXV3hoEzt05FT8A97nFzjpyv/QHdM38E cEQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VbKRGFtApKeoCSRJtcYhOPqxGpb7lCDKQa5iooCLw4Q=; b=OtvI7Jpm0+FA1OSqBvvvwM9ZsBEU2zOFWMqIod2G0V/M8ca/QKkSCkBqAO5D83LSWr I/qmqdFWJKcZcBmBJ6EvZuClSWm5H6o2E2kyLD7CWcPo3jShNhs0AbYRi/c5UyK5j3re UohKLTFqUxRe4VDJmU9n0J0C/8Px/lcJJD400TaP6yEf/kZBw3mPHMr3dD7+fMPS2H// DlJGt0vXRHW7fgaRT6Dqz0tfPfF8IbdYmVsATy4qj2vmx9j1lfzKlk4Jr2Xv1Ib6KoCp W7ksoJuOT0S8eg7oJqrlLkdVeYauKuT3BI4S+KaktgIFFotuRJnAAINIvFZCTdUyoqC/ p93g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Ya8zw82s7vSgp1edt6Po5KvVgb8rPkhS2oSM0Lh9SPaOwXtJ4 tQp5sSu17rkI6wWBTae8kLFhKr6sdC1DqaonoEJ9FlQGVu4ouQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAvUO7OjxwHAoCIzeS79ggLPFVrWje14M7BSLzDwTtUZ2UylkMjASaMiNNTjvSnfUjoAEkCLzO4N328q0SNA8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:10c6:: with SMTP id k6mr784071lfg.36.1628109693755; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 13:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 22:41:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMHBB9UskXvR7V+VReqMKwFqunP+NhifUmwRSm6yNSOJFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f3b81305c8c1d3e8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/JSAVzvlfNzYvPO7pQkm2C4RtTLk>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 20:41:43 -0000

> Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> compressing SRv6 information?

Yes.

This is data plane and any "flexibility" of more then one solution in data
plane would only bring pain to everyone.

Thx,
R.





On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 8:52 PM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts
> on the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the
> working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic
> for a separate email a bit later.
>
> Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and
> the perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the
> discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to
> everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to
> re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the
> discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their
> opinion is and an explanation of why.
>
> The question we are asking you to comment on is:
>
> Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> compressing SRv6 information?
>
> Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of
> business PDT on 20-August-2021.
>
> Thank you,
> Joel, Jim, and Bruno
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>