[spring] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-12: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 25 April 2023 15:07 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org, bruno.decraene@orange.com, bruno.decraene@orange.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <168243524978.50705.52788521439905990@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:07:29 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/JXtzihTEsdbovEn7ZZNI8wp5hMo>
Subject: [spring] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-12: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Thanks for this document.  I have one minor comment/question:

Minor level comments:

(1) p 9, sec 4.  SR-based SFC with Integrated NSH Service Plane

             +------------+        +------------+        +------------+
             |   S(SF1)   |        |   S(SF2)   |        | F:Inner Pkt|
             +------------+        +------------+        +------------+
             |   S(SFF2)  |        | N(100,254) |
             +------------+        +------------+
             |   S(SF2)   |        | F:Inner Pkt|
             +------------+        +------------+
             | N(100,255) |
             +------------+
             | F:Inner Pkt|
             +------------+

>From this diagram, it wasn't clear to me why the segments have got from "SF1,
SFF2, SF2" at step (1) to just "SF2" at step (4).

Regards,
Rob

[spring] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ie… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
Re: [spring] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draf… James Guichard