Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt

"Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com> Fri, 18 June 2021 14:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBAC3A4554; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 07:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=cPIO9hP1; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=RIH4QWhK
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IA5VwANoupSA; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 07:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 481313A4552; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 07:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16752; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1624027370; x=1625236970; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=DEkfzgZJsPN8UMfQOu6cfVf1tnawBUTwzDqbX31pwqg=; b=cPIO9hP1t1A3uvc0oDeGkqV/gOljDBh1/IJhAyhZGM6E+t7pN8YyT8wf hF3nqEp3tunDRLgWcHkNu61GJhofQRFQmKYKcKiE36udGC5kI7nw2hjzp VOYIOpMCdqDgp+9Nm45tutuK+HAhwuCAtWz6qzRmrnZyDbNyF3EiDKZGc 4=;
X-IPAS-Result: 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
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:iSEXOhQcpEH2AEWDV0Gpj0H+oNpso1nLVj580XJvo7xTbrm58ovvP QrU4vA+xFPKXICO7fVChqKWtq37QmUP7N6Ht2xKa51DURIJyKB01wwtCcKIEwv3efjtaSFpE tleSUVo4Hy6d0NSHZW2a1jbuHbn6zkUF132PhZ0IeKgHInUgoy32um+9oeVbR9PgW+2YKh5K 1O9qgCC3vQ=
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:ItCXCK5A/6kQ0aJOOQPXwU6BI+orL9Y04lQ7vn2ZFiY1TiXIra 6TdaoguiMc0AxhJ03Jmbi7Sc69qADnhOBICOgqTPaftWzd2FdAQ7sSlrcKrweQfhEWs9QtqZ uIEJIOSOEYb2IK9/oSiTPQe71LrbX3k9HLuQ6d9QYRcegAUdAH0+4NMHfiLqQAfng+OXNWLu v52uN34x6bPVgHZMWyAXcIG8LZocfQqZ7gaRkaQzY69Qinl1qTmf3HOind+i1bfyJEwL8k/2 SAuRf+/L+fv/ayzQKZ/3PP7q5RhMDqxrJ4dY6xY4kuW3DRYzSTFcNcso65zXYISSaUmQ8Xee z30lMd1gJImivsly+O0EDQMkLboUcTAjfZuC+laD3Y0JbErPZQMbscuWqfGSGptnbI9esMo5 5jziaXsYFaAgjHmzm479/UVwtynk7xunY6l/UP5kYvHLf2RYUh5rD3xnklWqvo3RiKnrwPAa 1rFoXR9fxWeVSVYzTQuXRu2sWlWjA2Eg2dSkYPt8SJ23wO9UoJgHcw1YgahDMN5Zg9Q55L66 DNNblpjqhHSosTYbhmDOkMTMOrAijGQA7KMmiVPVP7fZt3d04la6SHqIndwdvaNqDg4KFC7K gpYWko/FLaIXiefPFm9Kc7hSwlbl/NLwjQ9g==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,284,1616457600"; d="scan'208,217";a="756290130"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 18 Jun 2021 14:42:49 +0000
Received: from mail.cisco.com (xbe-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.18]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 15IEgmFB002075 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:42:48 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xbe-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:42:48 -0500
Received: from xfe-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.249) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 10:42:47 -0400
Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xfe-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.249) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:42:47 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=cZE5/EFK/tomjavFWattpNE2Jpt44FUblW40UscU4Ywcbv43WdF8p8R2pVy3At8widm7d8tvuwYDygb+K5dJT5JVJO3KJnmnI8zu7PayNiPBuXSOyYZ42BhzCQwQPueEQ/FGl4xxxEXkwif4F6fJKT0qo9xNUJWcGzollx5llhnGI5UKx1f6zEWdMa/HVnn/myIMYRru+o43PobGxiCM2CdEG7ASf7QA7rVLVH2+AHpavFHSeGvlNgiZA/zUmxjfl8ngJzGGuBGRDT0S27qPllssG8j8JtXwNk6WDtv08miHai2hIRmtZQ0ay83v/OPSkS2bBO84RnsIgypVNrhkeg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=QbFHrJwmt/hmFBym/3/DeSOniHofnRENBx+T9VD2MzY=; b=E17qgdYc7/hITz0XrUJYIOBO+qzllU731nf2JvNRcTeU2JVWPZMnRXXyOjTE0vI9keG7fAHw4nxQ5RUeUitZcdZpSiJThnPAAQU2FwWAPuZu7AI8wrt5z61jSEZY+Dn48HI5rkhZum3FtuzAWrBYyU4FhH3YJJnKC/euLPolTCJ2zkx1bSgVEIf494JUhuot9+TtISVD+r6KMN0c0/i5x8L8PAnmybJxaEl1UfjrEcSBoPtBayZlPQ+3+1mYhREEljvw6wlYDhbiYv7AyfXawAJq7v40myWtrhG3Hbw1EfwYzCaocahzw8PN8z6wbRmDVddUc+VVPbsIJryI9mU/EA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=QbFHrJwmt/hmFBym/3/DeSOniHofnRENBx+T9VD2MzY=; b=RIH4QWhKhy+eT/RbY4/UROaIwKq3DamPMJ+g3xhLnqJjEEypUGR23ggnJK5Jf5/+wF23uC9xE6xwj9g9gxQJ3C2zR/t+rqj+kYUZqGjmlAD9arqSNiyHjY0cJj34OtTjP7a5jFASzjEXTApBR6LydsoFb8KoXV68XMJNGAUX5F0=
Received: from MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:5f::22) by CO1PR11MB4962.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:99::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4242.19; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:42:44 +0000
Received: from MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::78ab:1551:55d:b1a2]) by MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::78ab:1551:55d:b1a2%5]) with mapi id 15.20.4242.021; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:42:44 +0000
From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
To: James Guichard <jguichar@futurewei.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
CC: "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption Call for https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt
Thread-Index: AddbmCZ9jb/YEEGBSlWsw0k+nsZyIQIsOStw
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:42:44 +0000
Message-ID: <MW3PR11MB457060846F08BC8C8F745075C10D9@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR13MB42066A2630749C71112DA3A9C2389@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR13MB42066A2630749C71112DA3A9C2389@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: futurewei.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;futurewei.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [106.193.186.79]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0572cce9-c409-4d1d-c945-08d932675593
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CO1PR11MB4962:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO1PR11MB4962731923724A40AD8D3507C10D9@CO1PR11MB4962.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(366004)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(396003)(136003)(5660300002)(33656002)(6506007)(4326008)(9326002)(64756008)(186003)(122000001)(2906002)(38100700002)(8676002)(55016002)(316002)(52536014)(9686003)(478600001)(7696005)(71200400001)(53546011)(26005)(83380400001)(8936002)(66446008)(76116006)(66946007)(166002)(66476007)(66556008)(110136005)(966005)(86362001)(163123001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MW3PR11MB457060846F08BC8C8F745075C10D9MW3PR11MB4570namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0572cce9-c409-4d1d-c945-08d932675593
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Jun 2021 14:42:44.7618 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 9FE0HCTpuWKVXOQBuweFm1dHzbce7T3Y2HZ9hjwsBX3Bwb1YMSo9ydV1zHdoqgWG27lx1Rmx4DmTuwo7u7hVUA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR11MB4962
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.18, xbe-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/KdkL34dI5zDyX6t-DGrJcgD3HNg>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:42:56 -0000

Hello,

I've reviewed this document and thanks for the updates over the past few months since the last WG adoption. The changes made to align with the STAMP work in IPPM WG and the companion IPPM document look good to me. The document overall has improved as well.

The requirement for performance measurement in SR networks is essential for delivering services for different SLAs and this work is critical to monitor key parameters like delay and loss in SR networks and especially for SR Policies. The choice of STAMP is also very apt as something that is supported in various data-plane implementations and also importantly works for both SR-MPLS and SRv6 - a common mechanism. Therefore I support the adoption of this work by the WG.

Coming to the document itself, given that this is an adoption call, I would like to provide two high-level comments to the authors (but also for the WG/chairs to discuss/consider) :


  1.  I find it odd that this work is categorized as Informational where it clearly needs to be Standards Track. IIRC, it was Standards Track at the previous adoption call. The document contains the procedures for the performance measurements that need to be standardized to have interoperability and consistency across vendor implementations. Operators expect this. Standardization is not just about packet formats on the wire and procedures are equally important.
  2.  Somewhat related to (1), I would expect the language for the procedures to be described in a bit more formal/tighter way and perhaps make use of normative language. I will give a couple of examples below:



Sec 4.1.2 :  Shouldn't the selection of Destination Address/Session-Reflector Address be specified in a more normative way?
   The STAMP Session-Sender IPv4 or IPv6 address is used as the Source
   Address.  The SR Policy endpoint IPv4 or IPv6 address is used as the
   Destination Address.



Sec 4.1.2.1 - isn't it required that all SLs be monitored? So that would be a MUST monitor all SLs?

   An SR-MPLS Policy may contain a number of Segment Lists (SLs).  A

   STAMP Session-Sender test packet is transmitted for each Segment List

   of the SR-MPLS Policy.



The above are not really blocking comments for the adoption and I will request the authors to consider this.

Thanks,
Ketan

From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: 07 June 2021 18:04
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt

Dear WG:

The IPPM WG has adopted https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm-00<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm-00&data=04%7C01%7Cjguichar%40futurewei.com%7C68a7e8999c0e4d09f3fa08d927af658a%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637584456542518360%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=G3aKv%2FCnBQskcEVz4GCGVK2tdCrzBldv3yBiUXkYR%2B8%3D&reserved=0> as a WG document. In a previous communication (December 16th 2020), the SPRING chairs decided not to adopt https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt into the WG until its companion document was accepted by the IPPM WG. This has now happened and therefore we feel it is now time to revisit the WG adoption of the SPRING document.

Due to the lapse of several months since the initial WG adoption call, the chairs would like to start another 2-week WG adoption call for https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt, ending June 21st 2021.

After review of the SPRING document please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption to the mailing list. Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or lack thereof) as silence will not be considered as consent.

Thanks!

Jim, Joel & Bruno