IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Mike Simpson <mikie.simpson@gmail.com> Wed, 26 February 2020 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mikie.simpson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C2D3A1184; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:24:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DE0fSDxFRjdq; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:24:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB963A1179; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:24:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id p18so126479wre.9; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:24:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=wy89sbby+d/VF2Mr5prXmTguA308ufSBbGbXyxBHtrM=; b=DdkIV+6l8IJerKeTs62XObMRbu8/ZicoJxb5TqkHpw4z7/4QpakWyECDL9qbe5whKj LFAjTBIuYaIAToiPVP5bYnJx/oRsDaeId25uzbjWcqxvMaAdvEckxR9VRmYROLMEE5O1 bKDW6a1caEA9URxMXzU6/kNolIgNX16vERKrOsn/WEeTHPiGj8WQ6z/CKzoTc475JG1p QAV4HMiG2NHZexcI0Dh5O8Lay5UiEnDijhkJmvntMgChShkuSsOoRn5vP2UFhx9V9KWF rHJLvLP25ZnWwOpzgMRi3UnGF3/VUdg4IrvZh2pZs7hWCwUB48xQ2E/JBO6EAwkOh7oG OPpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=wy89sbby+d/VF2Mr5prXmTguA308ufSBbGbXyxBHtrM=; b=geNuBuHUOlV+hGNoT3P9onljgFmqcGX3r4w2IFJQyGlFBH/0lvtnN0cqvWyqA5dngm dXF94IdLDTi/pEgBEaySQLrg0gKXaY7jM3NNje+IWbWNVxpH4tOxWW37Z/c+bbSBZYwm uHYUrP1I1jFrTvTV6gGdhJ5WGy7gPz1EPGvSEuI11fxBj2TVTUYbgu8N3yFGtl35BUIc hRfR1Vv83auuhF/C9auTqAd9BBX6vWA3I6GPkNHyaTpViFP/LghAmd90hn9kHHVT+Z/9 uZ1I+irBmB+nTkxYSLRI5kX3qACVpn8d3QFl8Z3dXMRYNSHdkzegpJ2p9ru+61AtNvu0 9gIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXFspILRYshA9ieXttomSrq4uHUEcMVIVRA0dNNxzlK6F0m7UdW S+2ntuKnB0Xi5wN/Tbp7aoEr0DcG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyCNgZNTX9mOhI/H1NCublklt7UFTz5+n67LVP4d1I1JlmhXe1wt4GEMaQIpP9ze0AoGp4MBg==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4ac8:: with SMTP id y8mr187931wrs.272.1582745075847; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:24:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:1270:0:6023:e9ba:c03b:9604? ([2001:67c:1270:0:6023:e9ba:c03b:9604]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h13sm5122519wrw.54.2020.02.26.11.24.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:24:35 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Mike Simpson <mikie.simpson@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:24:30 +0000
Message-Id: <EC9B264E-8A28-456C-B782-CBE57F45569A@gmail.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJ_ipEvU0NUx44XbK0_DrLe_GRw6G=m+chK4wZcRP8BMg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: John Leddy <john@leddy.net>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJ_ipEvU0NUx44XbK0_DrLe_GRw6G=m+chK4wZcRP8BMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17E5233g)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/MQVlBEyr6F1S3mZRCENmted5t-k>
Subject: Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:24:40 -0000

On 26 Feb 2020, at 19:16, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> 
> I would suggest that people read RFC 7282 - "On Consensus and Humming
> in the IETF", especially Sections 3 & 6 (it is a short document, you
> should read the whole thing, but pay special attention to these
> sections).
> 
> It doesn't really matter how many people say +1 for moving it forwards
> -- if there are valid technical objections these have to be dealt with
> - and I think that the relationship with RFC8200 falling into this
> category...
> 
> W
> 

+1 for not violating RFC8200

Mike


>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 2:01 PM John Leddy <john@leddy.net> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 in support of moving the document forward.
>> 
>> John Leddy
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>>> On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:22 AM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Zafar,
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 26, 2020, at 9:43 AM, Zafar Ali (zali) <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> +1,
>>>> 
>>>> Just to add, in the spirit of IETF https://www.ietf.org/how/runningcode/ …
>>>> implementation, commercial deployment and Inter-op status has been documented in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status/
>>> 
>>> I think the proper question is there a consensus to advance this document.
>>> 
>>> There seems to be questions about its relationship with RFC8200.  I am not seeing this as being resolved.
>>> 
>>> Bob
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>   ---maf
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email