Re: [spring] SRv6 compression

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Tue, 27 July 2021 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F283A00E3 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 09:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iD4RcyeTmxxW for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 09:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5843A00E1 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 09:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id mz5-20020a17090b3785b0290176ecf64922so5024296pjb.3 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 09:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xbSBCAAiS1XyiVmhRFGDY5mbtMLKjXt68Dcgy94o8E0=; b=aefsOQM+DHxJqvwjtWph3ruYQDir76G1tA56cpgeCEoepXhhTGVPS3S+xsMdGieO4h O1FY7Q65PsDNIELvOSD3ZQIWYqh7zs+K5SwO6BXze7sGMRpHO0fbfHgHfKFMbJkMUFpf xAQMloziw6dQaFWPMZjwm20pU1bEJ2VHNHu9APR/+nsK7CwPqtAmRTJxyhWDbmmqEyhl kU7v0N3QzBeZ/ce+YsTnT4VmAdxIn8AwqEu3uHO2k7hKaIV26J7Wb2RFYo4XIeJRPU4q 4g+KXLxucNMlFKHrLDhbN1GgFCCyqE6LbBDgqvwlzrhea39eG3eJrQrrDHrSLSP/3rbk EryA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xbSBCAAiS1XyiVmhRFGDY5mbtMLKjXt68Dcgy94o8E0=; b=hPQ3bsTMkETrNNYzIdPWoXE3fhe/UJ/eCe6xusJdMkihNKztndPNBX3PZwAKNp5F7V Ki7aMbK+mbUPyfC24m4/wHROOsV7rZ+Y55c8oRTJBgA69Vf3RKLrBGx7DjV1AJd6UICk CrY5HKkJYZfY8TvUejbnMjYL5Sriu5m6OyLOjyv0uR/erhlGSmldiC5MNV28fBQfUDwU xVhrJh7YinkOxkD6fd5Rpdx2xnRCcxHwOmbusWv5QqyvKYca52N+Ik7DGPC69m4d9j6M x6m7/h6il8qfFstN6YuHkFwWYt3DjfeFpwrZ/a5rjmRBU2JOAfsP90u5Jq6mkNkcGzsO Mfmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533M8cH5g254YutOt3ndU5+8pIg77KUlDkO+FNiQE6iEIwqEMkNh JIu1EFn6+kPWhc8l2zjr+dPtPvnHCVqpHwQjU3I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx3bhKRMz0dhHWgRd6mi7QdaPDS3RX1Rg5PEwxlZ+FLcinakKwl2uhG4vKvYnfMpcWofm1AG6LhBBjJe4J+ElI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:180e:b029:39e:4765:20c4 with SMTP id y14-20020a056a00180eb029039e476520c4mr6885079pfa.30.1627402178272; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 09:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AM0PR07MB44978A05B5BFCD3A0A79FD2D83E99@AM0PR07MB4497.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <BY3PR08MB706058AA99ADC757AA717982F7E99@BY3PR08MB7060.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <DM6PR08MB6027A0F55D0146ECDA8C8923E4E99@DM6PR08MB6027.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR08MB6027A0F55D0146ECDA8C8923E4E99@DM6PR08MB6027.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:09:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV0DYH8xO_9T2HiKj_6rc3gh6c2PWFdP5XPjDma_yktPCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <mustapha.aissaoui@nokia.com>
Cc: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000be211a05c81d1843"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/MnDh1j7Ofh3XOEHvqWc31MF37IU>
Subject: Re: [spring] SRv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:09:44 -0000

For all operators around the world looking at deployment of SRv6
compression and being in a  holding pattern waiting for SRv6 compression to
be standardized by the IETF.

Given the ubiquitous importance of SRV6 compression and MSD issues with
long strict SR-TE explicit route object,  it is critical for
interoperability for all steering use cases that exist today: enterprise,
internet, private, access network - 5G wireless xHaul, mobile core,
wireline, MBB, FBB.

We as a WG need a single standardized solution for SRv6 compression for
interoperability to work and all vendors marching to the same sheet of
music.

I agree that the NVO3 - GENEVE is a solid precedence path forward to take
and for Spring WG to come to consensus and standardize on one solution and
progress the other solutions as informational if implementations already
exist.

Kind Regards

Gyan
Verizon Inc

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:12 AM Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <
mustapha.aissaoui@nokia.com> wrote:

> Same here. We want a single standard method of SID compression to allow
> the WG to focus on finalizing it and get vendors hardware implementations
> updated.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Mustapha.
>
>
>
> *From:* spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Rabadan, Jorge
> (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4:54 AM
> *To:* Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>om>;
> spring@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [spring] SRv6 compression
>
>
>
> I agree with Wim’s statement that the precedent in NVO3 **could** apply
> here too: pick one solution as Standard’s track RFC, and once it is done,
> the others might be documented as Informational RFCs if they have
> implementations.
>
>
>
> That would help the industry to move forward.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Henderickx, Wim
> (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, July 27, 2021 at 9:11 AM
> *To: *spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[spring] SRv6 compression
>
> Given the design team accomplished the work on providing requirements and
> analysis to compress an SRv6 SID list, I would recommend we pick 1 solution
> similar to what was done in NVO3 (when we discussed GENEVE, GUE, GPE, etc)
> given this has to be implemented in HW..
>
>
>
> I hope we can conclude on this asap and move forward on this topic
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*