Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
Martin Horneffer <maho@lab.dtag.de> Fri, 06 August 2021 08:07 UTC
Return-Path: <maho@lab.dtag.de>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727293A23FC for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lab.dtag.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2TROScvsqP-d for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from darkmatter.lab.dtag.de (DarkMatter.lab.DTAG.de [194.25.1.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 112B53A23F3 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 4B024C06A1 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 10:07:13 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lab.dtag.de; s=dkim; t=1628237240; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=P/SWwdYxSw1qhjr/aAhSzoUQ7ZrdcG+bP+yEe4UmST8=; b=zITAU8FhNgmIG+zU0cnCQpIjB1NNTVm/80u1ohDD+1C36TPxVucwEHFBgt1s9fFKjzJz60 vAaJjzKVRgYITShoOt6MCUeSBAiwAX5+bq9s8V35TQKD6L6n92KAmvmfwU4vZVq/aDKIvQ 0/aVBbrMXoxZcdPjiOB/hhJgS4XGe+stVjS8gUhyXlbKHv4wPhw22etSMULfwkgz5UmcdP /vu/K7fpDECf3GHz1SwadNutiF1ItI9B+rp5nHrZucGZxpk2difC7D6OU5HMzs07yiK1Kd 0csTfrqZweFXd8AZaGs+DuMB6oN12XbVN6732YoOqSJmMqTMtOXICHgBH1APwQ==
To: spring@ietf.org
References: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com>
From: Martin Horneffer <maho@lab.dtag.de>
Message-ID: <9cac5669-0867-f1fc-235d-b9b434aedeb7@lab.dtag.de>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 10:07:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Mr248NCgjXXBlMHjgrqUcevZOrI>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 08:07:33 -0000
My opinion clearly is: The WG should standardize ONE solution for SRv6 header compression, and it should follow to results of the DT. Reason: As an operator I could theoretically ignore the effort vendors have for implementing solution that I do not care for. In reality however that usually does takes critical ressources away from implementing the technology that I need. The effect is much later interoperability. Best regards, Martin Am 04.08.21 um 20:52 schrieb Joel M. Halpern: > The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts > on the requirements and analysis drafts. The question of how the > working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic > for a separate email a bit later. > > Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and > the perspectives being expressed. While the topic was well-raised, the > discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to > everyone what the purpose is. In particular, the chairs have decided to > re-ask the question. We ask that even those who have responded in the > discussion respond to this thread. Preferably with both what their > opinion is and an explanation of why. > > The question we are asking you to comment on is: > > Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for > compressing SRv6 information? > > Please speak up. We are looking to collect responses until close of > business PDT on 20-August-2021. > > Thank you, > Joel, Jim, and Bruno > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
- [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 c… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Tony Li
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Keyur Patel
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- [spring] 答复: Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Lihao
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Eduard Metz
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Takuya Miyasaka
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Bernier, Daniel
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Stefano Salsano
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Martin Horneffer
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Boris Hassanov
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Luis M. Contreras
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Aijun Wang
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Ville Hallivuori
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Shunsuke Homma
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… James Guichard
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Ahmed MostafaSaleh ElSawaf
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… gregory.mirsky
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Luc-Fabrice Ndifor Ngwa [ MTN Cameroon ]
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Huaimo Chen
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Loa Andersson
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Sales, Bernard (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Yingzhen Qu
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Satoru Matsushima
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Joel Halpern
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Haoyu Song
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IP… Dirk Steinberg