Re: [spring] draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression-02#section-4.1.1

[Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]>]

Dear Spring Authors

Please respond to this question the WG has related to which of the three
SRv6 forwarding mechanisms called  flavors was inclusive of the compression
analysis draft.

The Analysis draft is ambiguous as to which SRv6 forwarding plane flavor
was part of the analysis.

This is a critical question that has come up by the WG and Chairs, and
answering this question will help pave the way to an adoption call for
C-SID.

Kind Regards

Gyan

On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 3:33 PM Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Dear Authors
>
> After having a few discussions on threads related to the SRv6 compression
> analysis draft results, as well as WG coming to consensus on a single SRv6
> compression solution, a few critical questions have come up related to
> C-SID draft that requires clarification by the authors.
>
> The C-SID draft has 3 compression solutions below and is a combination of
> the two drafts below which introduces 2 of the 3 compression solutions with
> the  C-SID draft introduction of yet a 3rd compression solution.
>
> Which of the 3 C-SID draft compression solutions was included as part of
> the DT analysis draft results and conclusion?
>
> This is a critical question that needs to be answered for clarification on
> the C-SID draft solution.
>
> As the WG has consensus on a single solution we need to have clarification
> from the authors which of the 3 compression solutions was included in the
> analysis.
>
> The three solutions are very different and all would yield different
> analysis results.
>
> I understand the authors have called the each solution a endpoint flavor
> which I see from the IANA codepoint allocations, however each flavor is a
> different solution.
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/segment-routing/segment-routing.xhtml
>
> So the WG as stated would like a single solution so now we need feedback
> from the authors which of the three solutions or endpoint flavors was part
> of the DT analysis draft that the authors would like to put forward as the
> single compression solution.
>
> C-SID is a combination of the two drafts below:
>
> Combination of the two drafts below:
>
> G-SID - Generalized SID “REPLACE-C-SID”
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cl-spring-generalized-srv6-for-cmpr-03
>
> SRv6 uSID micro-segment “ NEXT-C-SID”
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-filsfils-spring-net-pgm-extension-srv6-usid-10
>
> Kind Regards
>
>
> Gyan
> --
>
> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions A**rchitect *
>
> *Email [e-mail] <[e-mail]>*
>
>
>
> *M 301 502-1347*
>
> --

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email [e-mail] <[e-mail]>*



*M 301 502-1347*