[spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security (ends Aug/19)

[Eduard Metz <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

I support adoption as a WG document, it is valuable to have a
separate security considerations document - this provides a good start

cheers,
 Eduard

On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 3:04 PM Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Dear WG:
>
> This message starts a two-week adoption call for
> ddraft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security, ending on August/19. From the
> Abstract:
>
>    This document discusses security considerations in SRv6 networks,
>    including the potential threats and the possible mitigation methods.
>    The document does not define any new security protocols or extensions
>    to existing protocols.
>
>
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security/
>
>
> Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoption
> by the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate support
> or opposition -- this is not a vote.
>
> If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state it
> explicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in the
> working group willing to work on the document.
>
> WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is
> whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG's time to work on and
> whether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs are
> particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who are not
> authors of the document.
>
> Note that the IESG requested that the WG deliver a document covering
> security considerations for SRv6. This document is intended to satisfy
> that request.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alvaro (for the Chairs)
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>