IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Fri, 22 May 2020 14:42 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E074F3A0B06; Fri, 22 May 2020 07:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hVdScdlIwTNn; Fri, 22 May 2020 07:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5EC93A0AF9; Fri, 22 May 2020 07:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8E14C; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:42:17 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1590158535; bh=ZQ7yctb+bI+SH0Tj1mq Kaseh41AY9YEcw7BD5ybkaO0=; b=Tk1AklDkefkWsZXDa+qUnh7GSUjS9BmyqmJ OTb+ncP0iXkEY3qJBQDgaAcnGJYVicIYXY6rCU/nOeo6mEj2JNz3cSofWGz8pESl 4m8dd+2EKCag6pWPCp0vKTW2H3D7u+l/GyI4CpjdOVrMBGacvc+P1DteGA5NbyFF KLu0PH0U=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id HnrfZuvo7tVl; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:42:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:f17a:b652:9093:4d1f] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:f17a:b652:9093:4d1f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C73CA49; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:42:14 +0200 (CEST)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <7C15B9D1-6C42-49D1-9BF6-03AEB372BB4F@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C02D7EB5-7586-42D6-8BE2-61858042FC0B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 16:42:13 +0200
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR13MB3066CA70918022A394DB4BE8D2B40@DM6PR13MB3066.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>
To: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
References: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02A2CD12@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com> <DM6PR05MB63482CFA4D5AB938D5A4B818AEB40@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <AAC1BB04-59E9-4DAC-8B8E-3F12168C5C16@steffann.nl> <DM6PR13MB3066CA70918022A394DB4BE8D2B40@DM6PR13MB3066.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/NjqzjDvwkrgkV4CV9P_pSVo4Dkw>
Subject: Re: [spring] How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 14:42:35 -0000

Hi James,

> This separation of architecture is not new; see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr/ in the SPRING WG.

My apologies, I didn't mean to imply that all SPRING drafts did not specify a good architecture. The ones that don't have gotten me frustrated, and that frustration came out.

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email