Re: [spring] WG Adoption call - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis

I support WG adoption of these two documents.

Hats off for all the dedication and focus by the design team to
successfully complete the requirements document as well as complete the
well documented detailed analysis on the compression solutions.

In the compression analysis conclusion section before this draft is
published, I believe the WG should come to a final consensus on a single
compression solution and document the compression solution at the end of
the conclusion section.

I believe the solutions draft that the WG has consensus on  should as well
be adopted and progressed to RFC updating RFC 8986 SRv6 PGM and  RFC 8754
SRH on the SRv6 compression algorithm integration into the SRv6
specification.

Kind Regards

Gyan

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:50 AM Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) <
jorge.rabadan@nokia.com> wrote:

> I support the adoption of the two documents as WG documents.
>
> The design team has done a great job, and the result is pretty good. The
> documents are a great reference and should be adopted.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *From: *spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of
> bruno.decraene@orange.com <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 3:13 PM
> *To: *spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[spring] WG Adoption call -
> draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement -
> draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis
>
> Dear WG,
>
>
>
>
>
> The Design Team has produced two documents:
>
> - A requirement document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement
>
> - A solution analysis document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis
>
>
>
> Both have been presented to the WG and triggered some discussions but are
> still individual documents.
>
> We believe it's now time for the WG to consider taking ownership of those
> two documents.
>
> Note that, especially for those two documents, WG adoption does not
> necessarily mean RFC publication in particular if it turns out that the
> benefit of long term archive would not justify the WG and IESG effort to
> finalize those two documents.
>
>
>
>
>
> This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call, ending September  20th
> 2021, for:
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis
>
>
>
>
>
> After review of the document(s) please indicate support (or not) for WG
> adoption of the document(s) to the mailing list.
>
> Please also provide comments/reasons for your support (or lack thereof) as
> this is a stronger way to indicate your (non) support as this is not a vote.
>
>
>
> If you are willing to work on the document(s), please state this
> explicitly. This gives the chairs an indication of the energy level of
> people in the working group willing to work on the document.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Jim, Bruno & Joel
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
>
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
>
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
>
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*

*M 301 502-1347*