IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6.

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Fri, 06 September 2019 06:51 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A0312013D; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 23:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=h4QKbmUv; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=tTa4mCiu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TGi4bKfXQzf8; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 23:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0518312002E; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 23:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9077; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1567752673; x=1568962273; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=O6JYQXP/St4qeHzYBiFZCdjHvsC9NA/eVjXdmE1zb+g=; b=h4QKbmUvv5BAOfB3SBUTjXRVnunELXqxVfGow6vP9CfyXGc375Tvewb4 i3QSrhDLCPOj+PFXPGNIE46O+Qrc3J+62A5hENde1EJjMVwrGjklpdKvD 4m0FEWGsGscs6kifPVOYaupf5/ZoF3mtSmXWH0KTZXagHdhIOObBaGLZH Q=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:mGC53x0nS3Jq+/zpsmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxGCt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8TgZdYBUERoMiMEYhQslVdyMDUzTJ//xZCt8F8NHBxdo
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AaAADbAHJd/5pdJa1lGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBVAQBAQEBCwGBFS9QA21WIAQLKoQhg0cDinWCNyWTEYRcgS6BJANUCQEBAQwBARgBCgoCAQGEPwIXgiAjNQgOAgMJAQEEAQEBAgEGBG2FLgyFSgEBAQEDAQEQER0BASwLAQ8CAQgRAwECKAMCAgIlCxQJCAIEAQ0FIoMAAYEdTQMdAQIMnX8CgTiIYXOBMoJ9AQEFgTIBg2QYghYDBoE0AYt3GIFAP4ERJwwTgkw+gmEBAQEBgX8NCYJVMoImjFuCYIUhiRSOTQqCIIZ9jXQbmHqNfYgAjWmCeAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUwE2gVhwFTsqAYJBEoIwg3KEWTuFP3MBgSiPYQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,472,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="326005750"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 Sep 2019 06:51:12 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x866pCvj007722 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 Sep 2019 06:51:12 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 01:51:11 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 01:51:11 -0500
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 01:51:11 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=itSDzg0MWvg3g9iDFTvP0lxsJKqARM2iZ/6B8zisVnyIf1aQE6QwyKYOJ5O+LQUIcAMxrXCjOlBMJVaZVCWCkWu9BkpqdHvhGhDGE1TveXoGiy2nuLQ+OpE44TGq7VDYsYWqov7jOjJNiH3kzLTREzR3R2l/VlkMsPFstVKXYp80/rlUColCkV58a5ZgzgqAfdqZzVHeaB6n5SrnxWJpsTWaBRE6rVhAgDGtJdpk9YKjSznyW6vskqhbh0My+sYRYf/r1TdVCZydE/sUl7W0KU6Zx6m3hfElQxaf5xteiEPIS7YvQADxmL8pkLGr8WM+HKYQ6eFtyG2ZQbJMm2uHtg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=O6JYQXP/St4qeHzYBiFZCdjHvsC9NA/eVjXdmE1zb+g=; b=MtDbzZLQRRinARsBFyqJV8WGuMgxqxQ5K7aDY1djC0pK/KyevoHjznx1bpk+1LaCf0P2fNdtKnWYAdDo7LIF1Bv9Iloy6bQCbFHYMyd1ToN3b0vcnLGmnHtuKQVztjGZl5jDuj5eZDzU/GE9XCxD4kkXItiTSuUquU2GhNIz6k0fxcOkzfi4FHa5qJAFgm/Ou1OlYfo1CWEKQS086HUbr6f+aLopQfM5L8Q1eE17k8UkZe2QsgRuFzcB4O41sgw6xtkB7OpSGEH969OVRftNFS/jRS0ELLVMJg4DP3yAOJn/AJr/RApjrX1LoCursoJMbn7Nrnyj7TarAvOfhckPVA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=O6JYQXP/St4qeHzYBiFZCdjHvsC9NA/eVjXdmE1zb+g=; b=tTa4mCiu2Ux+olmIBwTnSn9nqAmK88bikfbgPtW5pC/F8QMwQn0KCIthahZpIhtEQwVH3UiHT/dVtK7itKgal59x/lh/Oce7lwOhVRV8eg//uzKBu/zQ/oH7uWsIQYMfnZ9oF0xF8qZd1QQGOXfEeuRp++kCZS7bdACC42SxtL0=
Received: from DM6PR11MB3324.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.176.122.29) by DM6PR11MB2921.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.216.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2220.22; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 06:51:10 +0000
Received: from DM6PR11MB3324.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4099:9726:6b62:cdfa]) by DM6PR11MB3324.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4099:9726:6b62:cdfa%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2241.014; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 06:51:10 +0000
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: "sthaug@nethelp.no" <sthaug@nethelp.no>, "rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org" <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [spring] Beyond SRv6.
Thread-Index: AQHVSwg0yM6n2rX/R0OF91+DcvSPFKcYjQIAgAHM44CAAA+hgIADqRSAgABHVgD//8KGAIAARIWAgAAFMQD//7+igA==
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 06:51:10 +0000
Message-ID: <9A5F94CB-51E2-4869-9DF2-A5105A786A72@cisco.com>
References: <BYAPR05MB5463EC3250F2A303A3641839AEBA0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <9CCE1F5C-A886-4B06-8B97-D0645CFFE5E2@cisco.com> <BYAPR05MB54637D3761C4BCC2B452241FAEBA0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <20190906.084132.330516044.sthaug@nethelp.no>
In-Reply-To: <20190906.084132.330516044.sthaug@nethelp.no>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1c.0.190812
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=zali@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0cc:1006::107]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 010da340-03e9-4f85-2238-08d7329699c9
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DM6PR11MB2921;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR11MB2921:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 4
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR11MB2921AE01BCA39B92EAFB2D52DEBA0@DM6PR11MB2921.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7219;
x-forefront-prvs: 0152EBA40F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(346002)(396003)(376002)(136003)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(966005)(11346002)(33656002)(46003)(2501003)(446003)(606006)(2616005)(476003)(2906002)(21615005)(478600001)(36756003)(6506007)(486006)(54906003)(76176011)(99286004)(58126008)(86362001)(186003)(110136005)(102836004)(53546011)(14454004)(107886003)(6436002)(76116006)(316002)(6246003)(4326008)(91956017)(66946007)(25786009)(7736002)(66556008)(64756008)(81156014)(9326002)(66476007)(66446008)(71200400001)(71190400001)(81166006)(8936002)(5660300002)(256004)(8676002)(53936002)(236005)(6306002)(54896002)(229853002)(6512007)(6486002)(6116002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR11MB2921; H:DM6PR11MB3324.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: nPMLa6zrRnMSf/RhUCz5gMpkTMQ0Ge/3EyHaNNw1cPr0rZDpQeCPPnKYsmST8NmZak5T/gpGumgJJS/iD3YckPA8hFx3fXcUs8ToUof8ib/zkxnV6GQH2qC+z/HCm0+vzFcFK8R1Ped6XchAr7lpl5/+xb1irDUwUOPnQNuL3Y+/BUqatVjcJNHsrwT87y3xRYfVvJHyq+czPkaYul2UxgkslUmwUbwL9QGSX1jq1STvK0bvOK1EPjofOZAPhZlnB/aTTdM6+pxhZ9dPbNpRUf0ZfpGXG82MvdEMEX+Ci9o038aAKtLBHNpcMv0a9b7rFAC/u0yiiN+UACIj+86AaMF/9rdfnt+WLWiyCpd5It+Tkf9Vrju4MwbWK9ZpTpv9OD5MFWsB+vAyvds+MsFQoRtddyRYSDQToXKKA53SHP8=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9A5F94CB51E248699DF2A5105A786A72ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 010da340-03e9-4f85-2238-08d7329699c9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Sep 2019 06:51:10.0444 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Lbk5udH1RREQEePnZnMqt/V6G5fN7P0HaNPVqB53iS5szIkIF1AZgmZ+RpqyUjwM
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR11MB2921
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/OgK9mt2jAx-8YE9u8wkfWOTW7Xk>
Subject: Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6.
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 06:51:16 -0000

Hi Steinar,

I am glad you asked.

I am not aware of any implementation of RFC 5837.

Even if it is implemented, it never talks about providing information from a distributed “local label mapping table”, as defined by the CRH.

Thanks

Regards … Zafar

From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "sthaug@nethelp.no" <sthaug@nethelp.no>
Date: Friday, September 6, 2019 at 2:42 AM
To: "rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org" <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6.

Nothing so complicated is required. At most, PING and TRACEROUTE with RFC 5837 extensions.

Are there any vendors actually implementing RFC 5837? Ivan Pepelnjak
commented "However, it looks like nobody implemented it in almost five
years since it was published." at

   https://blog.ipspace.net/2016/01/are-unnumbered-interfaces-harmful.html

Has the situation changed?

Steinar Haug, AS2116

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email