Re: [spring] TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08

Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 09 April 2018 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2617128C0A; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 08:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8Lv78ODLR8I; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 08:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FF241270AE; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 08:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id t67so19929890wmt.0; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 08:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZX2Aaw9n2Byl/hdWb6SOBmrLANdQZVW+5FrGAJjNtao=; b=szEeGppGPpWRmXLIoW8bgbxY1W3eMh+Fc7HXLqySx9mHpNS5oQKVBAk6kaRBMcQiLA fYNFh4RoVm4ZKvpr/+woYRYZQUqdN1VRRo4XP4JNwlca0Fq9GM7EVF3Hzt53hwoQLztU HsqXrOmoIFMth7QbJxpLZM1StgcXoZ/Zb5efnKuokkmDrCoMSxBwB7s+lN4RetoKDLmo ZPi5ejItTL6+3i49fXIOU9Qs5l9G/wLQ8YKpaE9kGUNTYw0Lsi5Tc7yoHcqGfK777nOD AgCU7r320vjPj9h1P8Vi3hCHIC+ou7QsBJfrcGDxT9Drfi1q4N7ZxrfK8c8Y7YKGTnm3 PcYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZX2Aaw9n2Byl/hdWb6SOBmrLANdQZVW+5FrGAJjNtao=; b=cl4GMQ2NZtny0j3TQIDT5IFtVCels69YJ0XOMdlf2D+MkXOHg/z8Vb6UrtEIt8wVVS pQmn0l2dsqqwWEwZoCXcs4ZvTpT0j1ciM4dMEiYFfWPWamFniRxGHosbiWDa5THkTui8 I11mz10LLqoymknkFI1pJDjO0w7BrFLe91Ss/NN7mZ6HRg9pciCI/xg/CCkYbThmBq1j R4/aNdrci++5ZKBoktvsIDxmactn1nifGm3dZ85Qbhaow5D+1J2CneTNH5sJIxcUOnVc 4KPhU0vRBJjwaD8py3dhjyB9bvSgAhzGPtbuP09TgxX3Vlk1GUZnM6j48XJRgqZnaI9a moXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBBrVMq4ZT28acxQRt2uhvqzvuyRffkqNkLAQWl9DXWa2+Bz1Ua 5xuKVdE3Pkxfgc3KK2bsAsU9lMvqTxU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+NKgRJhxcinkBSpcGiZcgSqhyNZqaETCcBQ5igO5QryxQj2ftlGfXgHyA+miMKCh44ZucvLw==
X-Received: by 10.80.201.139 with SMTP id w11mr22911363edh.251.1523286141645; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 08:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mn-mn10.local ([2a01:598:9185:4f77:2847:e9f7:2e5a:6eb5]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o56sm437755edc.19.2018.04.09.08.02.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Apr 2018 08:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
To: Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, tsv-art@ietf.org, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <a77a198c-2a5a-d754-8725-6d6685338f6c@gmail.com> <40ED2C86-3403-4D89-8CA8-FBB9651BF2AB@gmail.com> <CAMOQah8TYNaXMAAKJE2AQpbhwSf+ejhR1vdFmF9OQmzVfTw5rA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1c95fd24-b6bf-90e2-3879-a74eff7e9e40@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 17:02:18 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMOQah8TYNaXMAAKJE2AQpbhwSf+ejhR1vdFmF9OQmzVfTw5rA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/PTLBMMGZtus_wYe7pux_WzaL3mI>
Subject: Re: [spring] TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 15:02:49 -0000

Hi Gaurav,

Am 01.03.18 um 16:01 schrieb Gaurav Dawra:
> Hey Martin,
> 
> Seeking your feedback here. Regarding Section 7.1, The intent of the 
> document is to describe one suggestive way and do not attempt to 
> standardize any suggested mechanisms based considering the Informational 
> nature. Authors do not attempt to fully solve – but to indicate how SR 
> helps towards this.The details of how the hosts figure out what paths to 
> take through the network such that the TCP and application are not 
> affected is outside the scope of this document.
> 
> Would you prefer to add perhaps - “details outside the scope” or “this 
> is one of the ways” or something else?


Since the cited paper is really old and there is no up-to-date proof of 
any working implementation with real Internet traffic: Please remove 
this part.

This will require a lot of theoretical work, discussions the transport 
community, discussions with operating system vendors and testing in the 
wild open Internet.

Kind regards,

   Martin