Re: [spring] A possible additional topic for the discussion by the MPLS Open DT.

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Mon, 26 April 2021 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE493A1333; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q5chtlMNdeNO; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C5043A1332; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.7] (c83-250-136-37.bredband.comhem.se [83.250.136.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F0C732461F; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:25:11 +0200 (CEST)
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, MPLS Working Group <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org>, spring-chairs@ietf.org, pwe3 <pwe3@ietf.org>, pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>, huubatwork@gmail.com
References: <CA+RyBmVZY7jaZ=tRqwCFc8_JGqJ5NN6mMvGTDSmC3TpAUgq8XA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <9d2f0db4-718b-3ca4-f5bf-a6ab3e1f6318@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:24:35 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmVZY7jaZ=tRqwCFc8_JGqJ5NN6mMvGTDSmC3TpAUgq8XA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Q-rknhhzYCv1KTL1BoUTOyXjfGA>
Subject: Re: [spring] A possible additional topic for the discussion by the MPLS Open DT.
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:25:20 -0000

Greg,

Do you plan to post this - if you do so timely I'm prepared to give you 
30 min for a walk through at the DT meeting on Tuesday.

/Loa

On 20/04/2021 21:42, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> Dear All,
> Stewart, Adrian, Italo, Huub, and I had discussed the question of 
> multiple GALs in an MPLS label stack after the IETF-110. The question is 
> directly related to the mechanism proposed in 
> draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification/>. 
> I've put together a short draft (attached). It appears, that this issue 
> may fit in the scope of the work of the MPLS Open DT. Appreciate 
> your thoughts on whether it can be discussed at one of the Open DT 
> meetings. Also, welcome your comments, suggestion on the attached draft.
> 
> Regards,
> Greg (on behalf of the group)

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64