Re: [spring] Updating the SPRING WG Charter

Rob,

Two things

- do we have an available current state of the charter-to-bu-updated
   text.
- inline plz

On 2018-06-04 18:44, Rob Shakir wrote:
> Michael,
> 
> Thanks for the comment.
> 
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:42 AM Michael McBride 
> <Michael.McBride@huawei.com <mailto:Michael.McBride@huawei.com>> wrote:
> 
>     It would be helpful, while updating the charter, to state whether
>     multicast in SR is in/out of scope in order to know which wg to take
>     our future work.
> 
> 
> I think this is impractical. 

Yes, I agree that it is impractical have "everything" out of scope
listed. However for things being brought up for discussion we need
clear decisions/consensus documented on the mailing list.

Does your statement mean that "multicast in SR" is out of scope for
SPRING?

/Loa

If we state everything that is in or out of
> scope, we'll end up with a laundry list. The aim of the charter is to 
> define clearly the work that the WG should focus on. It does not mean 
> that we can never host discussion of individual drafts if they are 
> relevant. If there are requirements, we can always recharter if 
> something new becomes the highest priority for the industry w.r.t SR.
> 
> Kind regards,
> r.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
> 

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64