IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Wed, 26 February 2020 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6E23A0A70; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:18:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=KU4vUCOa; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=zSC9upSM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jkchgr_BnbKZ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:18:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC5203A0A32; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:18:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1306; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1582759127; x=1583968727; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=KvL21po0HFWwxgqZgbDR0axbR5dgGVn/nORipcdrfCs=; b=KU4vUCOapDA3NMLqFh2oxGFyCNZh1iyAV5msEWAxaIi096PKVXRpXgS8 1xCDdhyup/9yYQdILKlWrbmeV3SWK1JyCXU297O0wh6Yg34eBR6CQ2y5c uk5w02lNHh5itoeBIEN8cp8T09oM0dfWyBX7JXnioQC+EK8P6fhm/m1o7 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:4Yx6wR1ru4mEjtFusmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxKHt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8RVgOIdJSwdDjMwXmwI6B8vQBFPqKvXpYgQxHd9JUxlu+HToeUU=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CuAABq/FZe/51dJa1mGgEBAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBEQEBAQICAQEBAYF7gVRQBYFEIAQLKoQUg0YDimOCX5gUglIDVAkBAQEMAQEtAgQBAYRAAheBaiQ4EwIDDQEBBQEBAQIBBQRthTcMhWMBAQEBAxIREQwBATAHAQsEAgEIFQUCHwcCAgIwFRACBAENBSKDBIJLAy4BpG0CgTmIYnWBMoJ/AQEFhQ0YggwJgQ4qjCUagUE/gREnIIIeLj5rGQGGVzKCLJBlnzUKgjyWZRyCSYgbkEpEjiybRwIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSKBWHAVZQGCQVAYDY4dGCCDO4pVdIEpjXgBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,489,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="486330491"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 26 Feb 2020 23:18:32 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 01QNIWmQ019980 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:18:32 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:18:31 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 18:18:29 -0500
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:18:29 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Bs1CEJD7txJtDIWiopiYkFZ7BFN0SpU5aWg3Kas+QO7UvRiv52zLByqO0pEQ25Qtnvhz3aOOLxUm6TfdqrITeGBcRzz7p6ciNXIvoPp2dPVGC3GzL5sGkahSAPLSVQmMbW00NfBTBCPi0x+LrFOQ8RMbTYtLYx3b3quxkNbrZvW7cP1TTJKlkUf8/0iYZFwzmUwOw6QgkTu/Lg/chXOPwtse6S1BAJoDL4jPBf+Jh11jNMgwb3iCB1OCw8fJk2HcGN3yqUpunbsrpeQYo2RHEUDueZ5lOGuIjDeEMEzMx83/zpCPZ5iiq4j//cJd5Q0c6xu09O5ft2pLOzeitsWHSQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KvL21po0HFWwxgqZgbDR0axbR5dgGVn/nORipcdrfCs=; b=L5JvM5TfodD25h4DsGB5s0Iq0Ypq+Wpa9Qkpx9K1b+HxZ3AnUpnmMEsx3xTN7efnRVUSlAr076YskmrpYMYOyj0EwCsGEAlztXiO+vH9YWAzGEYvNUpOQs5+24sOLnApDw7VTGz0O4AhLv3pQZdHeH0ze7skQcj+HtNj3XjePhNePSED0WBINeRAq9waL8uJtCeijw8wWJDBSKH4zfa17KOolvgzEGIutkOHt60a4zGe88oyJOq2F2YdgWcAnzhmnAO8Qqorg/I8EkJiebz/9d2vTqKZ+4+TFsC6hu8haJ8nQ5dqimnOg2WT+04GnBTl6V+HFqwTNbAzgEaSpeDO8g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KvL21po0HFWwxgqZgbDR0axbR5dgGVn/nORipcdrfCs=; b=zSC9upSMXmQsyua6mE+bdErZ+a3Lo6e8ADMHTZe0k+3w7gLKwVSIRDDjfaz2mNDiofvp+brhTZRXwogutRJ0hjRagc4qDTSJ7khCCHErEyzqQ70u+la9eaJwXn9nlGIG9Gp0Qq+BZzddzFnuVpjV3OWfqFFeKL9v78c62LgkjHA=
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:10d::13) by DM5PR11MB1706.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:b::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.21; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:18:29 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca]) by DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2772.012; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:18:28 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, John Leddy <john@leddy.net>
CC: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Thread-Index: AQHV7NcwyVJMOq7Tekm6U4tnAA76Gqgt2IkAgABUpgA=
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:18:28 +0000
Message-ID: <ACA082A4-BC78-4C63-9F91-5C9A44F47642@cisco.com>
References: <F88E3F76-DD4B-4807-A458-85FABFF20D96@gmail.com> <5D218BFB-0D6F-4F7D-858F-B571A67DC47F@leddy.net> <CAHw9_iJ_ipEvU0NUx44XbK0_DrLe_GRw6G=m+chK4wZcRP8BMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJ_ipEvU0NUx44XbK0_DrLe_GRw6G=m+chK4wZcRP8BMg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.22.0.200209
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evyncke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:40c5:de2c:de59:d774]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b56ddf6a-48c7-44da-6907-08d7bb12303f
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB1706:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB17064DDF9A7E70266298DE31A9EA0@DM5PR11MB1706.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0325F6C77B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(366004)(346002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(6506007)(316002)(110136005)(8676002)(54906003)(4744005)(2616005)(4326008)(81166006)(33656002)(8936002)(81156014)(6512007)(71200400001)(91956017)(36756003)(76116006)(64756008)(66446008)(186003)(478600001)(6486002)(5660300002)(86362001)(66476007)(66556008)(2906002)(66946007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR11MB1706; H:DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: QXfyGEyQBGYMO6A9lpCxV6fNs+Af1ObPNV9S+lJcSR1gTXI5RcnAQpRKXIGgUhf8Jfc+gxkkPvrLEX5QKhY7riG/AZLfsJt1RDXuf9iKRCL8tfrp/Ty68Ow1m0pzxuv7emjIuLrkOJIg45eVIfsqxQ8GmgF5hnP6sP1ZtuPF6p2KNNtB8WxCpZVu7xzWYE7vzXB9oBwZ9JYgA9YhgTxsDtZYckig/0BVkdJSQiDUQd3h8GQgsOU81wv4vBhtTZZEpzEs88s7mHrnCR73dQDOdxsLRXjOIllfK3yRW35lwYnhJRQS+VeCJxR0xZE2N8ToQDeBMo7fAgOZDVvT/qGfLKegM14th09vqpRlqCkr36zbClJqzAtLY5jE8bJjLbitPpfjroKOLddnEc8IDt/mdnrXmTHOyRkcHbqIYKejL8jopmarUmMxqeqmPNXPHChS
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 4AJg3xncj9oh6r5GeKFPMvRkf+pX3YGQhJcrWKjtO/6Y+Arjd6RRmqBoi/Qw43WUmeiKmrpbqJYmAdT0B5cLMLl6yKY5Yjo2MpAVJjzIKZMd39pt6NNIsn7eoacfaFNFTUfTNh29pYmNqr6IhxPdhOBBU8Yj3UWP+wPOCVHqdoS778Fc2mtbXGN3vMlmiW6xnMZ59WpyiZvmUfrVcrYMNQ==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F4C1CBD834D91D459DD85B0FEC6079C4@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b56ddf6a-48c7-44da-6907-08d7bb12303f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Feb 2020 23:18:28.9092 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: SUEKwjviObf4lQxKNl56Gx7GRjwcRwLlJr/tGqNcZ6Q4SOcq3ThvuYneXuBRBES4BToOgZWIElf/NfS7AvBuJA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB1706
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.15, xch-aln-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/QeWijJfxNTE5r8Ep6wCX5jPD4I4>
Subject: Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:18:49 -0000

Writing this without any hat,

Please note that on the logical side, it still have to be "proven" that this idea is strictly forbidden by RFC 8200. Moreover, this 'proof' can technically wait until the IETF last call or even until the IESG ballot. I see little point in postponing the closing of the WGLC and advancing the document (of course, the document shepherd will need to carefully write the section about the rough WG consensus).

Finally, as far as I know, at the IETF we have no religion... else we would still be running NCP or IPv4 :-)

-éric

-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>

...%<...%<....
    
    It doesn't really matter how many people say +1 for moving it forwards
    -- if there are valid technical objections these have to be dealt with
    - and I think that the relationship with RFC8200 falling into this
    category...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email