Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

"Luis M. Contreras" <contreras.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 06 August 2021 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <contreras.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039BA3A0D34 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 11:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N-6W4REz7_If for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 11:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FFD43A0D32 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 11:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com with SMTP id e1so3010823qvs.13 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LHhY/AHNVGnlj1npl7cD9q4F3VJDCAzsUnI41ALe2/E=; b=qLxKx8Jw7r3J+79+pHKqq2AmCU7JXNMzaegkWnWuLS1BTnltENIl5sbRDmR+JPm8ws rHLHtPFUGw6CT3DDH6Z+NR11FC1TdChYFW4xaX2WZfJUMH2/BFXY/Nr6dQXwS74PRB9R 2ocopDJzVXsJh9GLR6rhtIoYGsr9GqoUBNiQ19tesFRVJt7Z+rcV7PXXEgePN08XBvOx uHlmEQfwuNvLb9fD7ZjrKwM6mkeIt4n0mcBD4n/2AbtalH3owIVcoy7xxUDdIxK73axp mBoD/4oczH7lyrN4xTz4+f/3I9ec5wcox4DWyS8VLzkRBfG9xeLBujmrlQPr0T9rvQhA QMNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LHhY/AHNVGnlj1npl7cD9q4F3VJDCAzsUnI41ALe2/E=; b=mn3JjVncTMWvRwmb5L6WdR3mB/ZOUjbzGRK2BitOhCNNwgCkwu1kxBvCOCSkcJ6Hq+ kItyH+PbgVbF1DmuFO7ATx58wG8tyi9wGAa9xgUXLvRthhjafSXey41FOhKjc5M1hSz7 JC3mfKmrLuoQZNT2PcU29HF/iTQquJzz8txG7Vj2qW2erMeJgbdkjR1+QeK8gFIaJCY2 KNJLxjD8Tt2T0a64Q798sC+hDD01S4+8wSrDczTCINrgoiSrYT10T70Ci0Mn3FJ2AMHg GpTa7mkEUSq9aLlDi2fssK6T8elnyYBv12MRqLyCe+TvhYx0mw9aU2zXubgN8Fh/Su+x qHag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dVqCUTplZ8vNmv1dbUo7SF6vpsXCrDVA80raMLLknXyywqjPi 9/L+52rBn/CLQWSVnNOUmlDtMvd5wUhPNcqpAQCZwEtw
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxBHOeM9Nj6qG5m+TdhXDhLehJWt3QcVOCFl6vhVNw2pkHR6Jg8oyMu0nNdJRfswCTD1o8AYW/u6YV/kpoCkmA=
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:58ed:: with SMTP id di13mr1253218qvb.32.1628273255899; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4c03c28c-2b7d-0a90-c2bb-5fff53d0bc4c@joelhalpern.com> <338165821.123035.1628269881366@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <338165821.123035.1628269881366@mail.yahoo.com>
From: "Luis M. Contreras" <contreras.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 20:07:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAE4dcx=_0UQfFcBLiAa7fZxKf-uHkHz0NQa5k8JimLT+ncDjhA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Hassanov <bhassanov=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000003e65f05c8e7e96c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/QmYX27X_vViAHc7GX22PK4CL9-M>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:07:44 -0000

+1

Best regards

Luis


El vie., 6 ago. 2021 19:12, Boris Hassanov <bhassanov=
40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org> escribió:

> Hi Joel and all,
>
> Please see my answer and comments below.
>
> >Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> compressing SRv6 information?
>
> Yes, we should pick up one data plane SRv6 compression mechanism. Even if
> It will be not an easy choice.
>
> I have been on vendors side for a while  but now saying from operator
> perspective: we need one standardized solution because we do not want to
> stuck with just one vendor and do not want to solve an interop nightmare
> between 2 or 3  different mechanisms from different vendors by ourselves in
> the nearest future.
>
> With all respect for the all vendors who invested much in particular
> technology.
>
> SY,
> Boris
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021, 09:52:48 PM GMT+3, Joel M. Halpern <
> jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>
>
> The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts
> on the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the
> working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic
> for a separate email a bit later.
>
> Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and
> the perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the
> discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to
> everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to
> re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the
> discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their
> opinion is and an explanation of why.
>
> The question we are asking you to comment on is:
>
> Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> compressing SRv6 information?
>
> Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of
> business PDT on 20-August-2021.
>
> Thank you,
> Joel, Jim, and Bruno
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>