Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Section 4.16
From: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <[email-masked]>
To: li zhenqiang <[email-masked]>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:45:30 +0000
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>

Li,

I have replied the technical questions regarding PSP and USP in the email thread from one week ago.
You have not provided any technical concern.

> “Further, the example for PSP in the companion doc srv6-net-pgm-illustration is wrong. PSP is used for END.DT4 in the companion doc while flavors are only defined for END, END.X and END.T in srv6-network-programming.”

The illustration in section 2.8.1 is correct. Please re-read it. PSP is used at node 3 together with the End.X behavior.

Regards,
Pablo.

Replies from one week ago:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/V0ZpjVLSVZxHaBwecXFxqJjlg_c
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/WrYzRZC0HKVgBYaYMCQVcTWrfak

From: li zhenqiang <[email-masked]>
Date: Tuesday, 15 October 2019 at 09:32
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Section 4.16
Resent from: <[email-masked]>
Resent to: <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>
Resent date: Tuesday, 15 October 2019 at 09:32

I suggest this section be removed from this version until the community reaches rough consensus.
Further, the example for PSP in the companion doc srv6-net-pgm-illustration is wrong. PSP is used for END.DT4 in the companion doc while flavors are only defined for END, END.X and END.T in srv6-network-programming.

Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
________________________________
[email-masked]

From: Ron Bonica<mailto:rbonica=[email-masked]>
Date: 2019-10-15 02:42
To: SPRING WG List<mailto:[email-masked]>
Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Section 4.16
Authors,

Lacking the B.INSERT and T.INSERT functions, can you describe a use-case for the PSP and USP flavors of the END, END.X and END.T functions?

                                              Ron

Juniper Business Use Only