[spring] Results of SR compression analysis?

"Yangfan (IP Standard)" <shirley.yangfan@huawei.com> Wed, 10 March 2021 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <shirley.yangfan@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56583A0DDC for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:18:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id weVY9xHfdRGf for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:18:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB35F3A0D9A for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:18:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml743-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown []) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Dwdt84D8Nz67xR2 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 01:12:16 +0800 (CST)
Received: from nkgeml702-chm.china.huawei.com ( by fraeml743-chm.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 18:18:14 +0100
Received: from nkgeml701-chm.china.huawei.com ( by nkgeml702-chm.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 01:18:12 +0800
Received: from nkgeml701-chm.china.huawei.com ([]) by nkgeml701-chm.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 01:18:12 +0800
From: "Yangfan (IP Standard)" <shirley.yangfan@huawei.com>
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Results of SR compression analysis?
Thread-Index: AdcV0PMJyKp7tY42RwaZwoF8RpRyAQ==
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:18:12 +0000
Message-ID: <cb87ac70d5a248b9a2267631ac610b14@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_cb87ac70d5a248b9a2267631ac610b14huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/VXamskjS0TcV_ughzEtykdz0myo>
Subject: [spring] Results of SR compression analysis?
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:18:21 -0000


First of all, I really appreciate the SR compression design team for their hard work.
But I found out the analysis results are empty in the analysis draft[1] as Xuesong pointed out at the meeting.

I tried to get the answer of why this is empty from the meeting minutes(https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-110-spring), and it seems that this has been discussed but the link in the minutes cannot work now. So anyone help?

Again, thanks to the contributions and looking forward to the results in the near future.

Best regards,

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis-00