Re: [spring] Completion of WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

Hi,

I am not aware of any IPRs related to this document.

Regards,
Takuya

On 2021/02/12 2:06, James Guichard wrote:
>
> Dear WG:
>
> This email ends the 2 week WG adoption call for 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/ 
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C9be5d4dab908405837f408d8ceadef29%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637486593751248808%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=AMf3lLJFjUUxSJLfQLS2HWZyD8KitGvrFm7n9CpY80Y%3D&reserved=0>. 
>
>
> Having reviewed all of the responses, the chairs believe that enough 
> support was received to adopt this document into the WG. However, 
> while the document is informational in nature, it does have a 
> normative dependency on 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments/ 
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C9be5d4dab908405837f408d8ceadef29%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637486593751248808%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=tco%2FwwumvVZ%2FbtvVutDh8Dzl3PseJM9X2Q%2FUhXvfR8Q%3D&reserved=0> 
> which will need to successfully complete WG LC before this document 
> will be able to progress from the WG queue. The chairs feel that more 
> work is necessary in terms of definition and interoperability of 
> resource-aware SIDs. In addition several comments were received during 
> the adoption call that will need to be addressed as the document 
> progresses through the WG process. Further, the chairs would like to 
> make it clear that adopting an informational document that proposes a 
> particular solution which utilizes resource-aware SIDs does **not** 
> preclude future adoption of other documents which propose a different 
> solution if the trade-offs are significantly different.
>
> Authors, please resubmit the document as 
> draft-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-00 and also provide explicit 
> confirmation as to whether you are aware of any IPR related to this 
> document.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim, Joel & Bruno
>
> *From:* James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 27, 2021 5:47 AM
> *To:* spring@ietf.org
> *Cc:* spring-chairs@ietf.org
> *Subject:* WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn
>
> Dear WG:
>
> This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call for 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/ 
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4aefbabc297942dc563408d8c2b93697%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637473448047191786%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=CW%2BREIvAYGW5RqEptdCZk4Q%2Ba1%2F4ta1XOa%2FzwEQjq1I%3D&reserved=0> 
> ending February 10^th 2021.
>
> After review of the document please indicate support (or not) for WG 
> adoption to the mailing list and if you are willing to work on the 
> document, please state this explicitly. This gives the chairs an 
> indication of the energy level of people in the working group willing 
> to work on this document. Please also provide comments/reasons for 
> your support (or lack thereof) as this is a stronger way to indicate 
> your (non) support as this is not a vote.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim, Bruno & Joel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring