Re: [spring] Question about SRv6 Insert function

Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com> Fri, 06 September 2019 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew.alston@liquidtelecom.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D119D120026 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47-EPQ3QDJbQ for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-182.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-182.mimecast.com [146.101.78.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A5DE1200E0 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-ve1eur03lp2059.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.9.59]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-209-_Z3cv3O5MyOm1yFLfxGaCA-1; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 17:03:11 +0100
Received: from VE1PR03MB5422.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.112.208) by VE1PR03MB5838.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.158.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2241.18; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 16:03:10 +0000
Received: from VE1PR03MB5422.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c456:2d7a:c516:486c]) by VE1PR03MB5422.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c456:2d7a:c516:486c%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2199.027; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 16:03:10 +0000
From: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com>
CC: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] Question about SRv6 Insert function
Thread-Index: AQHVXxis/gF6F9KunkOxVqkDbflgtacT7YMwgAFf0ICAA0V6AIABQWiAgANe6oCAAAKegIAAVJAAgABGMoCAAIh/gIAAfW0AgAABwAI=
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 16:03:09 +0000
Message-ID: <VE1PR03MB542230E54FEB8E9ABFC87F54EEBA0@VE1PR03MB5422.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <HK0PR03MB3970C6DCC635E7CD802D65FDFCBD0@HK0PR03MB3970.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR05MB54636A2332FED916A26A6F14AEBD0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <3e31873a-278a-2154-0e71-4d820bba323d@gont.com.ar> <4012D854-2F10-4476-951D-FFFE73C5083C@gmail.com> <cb2f56f8-acdc-d68d-0878-9609cb3d7b1b@gont.com.ar> <28214_1567694772_5D711FB4_28214_238_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48BFA9F3@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <b83a7060-0517-c6ad-f6b0-bc9e61e4667f@si6networks.com> <A6FA74AC-F349-4F01-A86A-949870134779@cisco.com> <BYAPR05MB546363BF8D7D1EC848EB3103AEBA0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CA+b+ERmdCB9RVstq2sUnkYLM29ayE6jZuWARQv7HRbsMW_Tu-w@mail.gmail.com>, <BYAPR05MB5463E9041AB1A10A46E2A9FAAEBA0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR05MB5463E9041AB1A10A46E2A9FAAEBA0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=True; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2019-09-06T15:46:52.9272469Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=Juniper Business Use Only; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=11; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Unknown
x-originating-ip: [197.155.81.36]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4089f3a4-58ec-48f4-b26b-08d732e3b6af
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:VE1PR03MB5838;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1PR03MB5838:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VE1PR03MB5838A05428C2535C31271802EEBA0@VE1PR03MB5838.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0152EBA40F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(396003)(366004)(346002)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(74316002)(5660300002)(33656002)(76176011)(6246003)(7736002)(316002)(54906003)(99286004)(86362001)(14454004)(6116002)(229853002)(3846002)(110136005)(486006)(66066001)(8676002)(54896002)(55016002)(10916006)(478600001)(71190400001)(71200400001)(53936002)(9686003)(81156014)(14444005)(6436002)(256004)(8936002)(446003)(186003)(52536014)(66946007)(76116006)(91956017)(66556008)(7696005)(25786009)(66446008)(64756008)(26005)(4326008)(66476007)(6506007)(2906002)(53546011)(102836004)(476003)(11346002)(81166006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:VE1PR03MB5838; H:VE1PR03MB5422.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: QOsS6ZBKxhI8ySC1Kl0au17TeFEJz/nfBbxIPg1aG9IQI6c6EEOJ7veQnIY+cc09H+4iJJKvVeOThZAPQP0Z89dVIsotNM7H5Fd9WFQBRwD+LWfx3HAOwcGTqvAjhoKO86vYg9ejG8zBRuGa4k/fa+CtI1dUwDUMbAtnL7sB0j/E6ER5vHsOoUZSd0tPhSO3zpHLDvYHVxDQOUY8Kbn6f9hYhPQFXytjdUcX518DV5MPsiNuz7mYsTwdJd0J+jpj+dAVaR4waClntYsIjC+tJzar57GMMDqrTrIprZi7zCjCGRVazB0mWo+zwsfUUthAEMhpezQhRVQcZTPB6/jUD4k049CfKwUGF/V/VgZC94s5MIni0kfyP15FLS64uggL0lFXbR5PUpHzt2tZ1DQ6eNB68dbrJUV9fGSydFhTUvM=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: liquidtelecom.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4089f3a4-58ec-48f4-b26b-08d732e3b6af
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Sep 2019 16:03:09.9067 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 68792612-0f0e-46cb-b16a-fcb82fd80cb1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: jm0q0Q4oDeOb+V8z6pXk7cVVjJJW/v8JKscymefmdrFvJ/txjhxa8e3S5KaNIo1fd1XLp3C2wJMR+lIBvr/POrcZ63EvAk7zY3faS/Pe30Q=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1PR03MB5838
X-MC-Unique: _Z3cv3O5MyOm1yFLfxGaCA-1
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_VE1PR03MB542230E54FEB8E9ABFC87F54EEBA0VE1PR03MB5422eurp_"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/nbbsD0bON8uBW_W2FGzmn9Bi6mg>
Subject: Re: [spring] Question about SRv6 Insert function
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 16:03:20 -0000

I second this - and I was extremely clear in my email to spring a few weeks ago - I believe that there is place for both srv6+ and the alternatives - especially since I point out that srv6+ solves an overhead problem that was not solved by srh or the programming draft - and actually pre-dates the usid mechanism.

Do I believe that the NP draft needs work to bring it inline with the consensus agreed approach to rfc8200 and potentially an update to rfc4291 needs to be done to sort out the semantic issues? Certainly - but that is not to say I want the work to stop - on the contrary - I have said it before - and will say it again - I believe we should work on both - and potentially have an interop draft where necessary - and then - let the operators make the choice as to which they wish to use.

There are people on this list who can attest to the fact that I broached the subject of interop with several vendors - and even the authors of some of the drafts under discussion - and I am more than happy to do the work on this if people are willing to join the effort.

Andrew

Liquid Telecommunications - Group Head Of IP Strategy
________________________________
From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 18:50
To: Robert Raszuk
Cc: Fernando Gont; spring@ietf.org; 6man@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [spring] Question about SRv6 Insert function

Robert,

Your comment about killing innovation in the IETF strikes me as being odd. I never recommended shutting down SRv6 work. In fact, I support it.

It is you who are asking to shut down SRv6+ work..

So, who is looking to kill innovation in the IETF?

                                                     Ron