Re: [spring] WG adoption call for draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment

Huaimo,
Responses inline below.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 7:46 AM Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@futurewei.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Authors,
>
>     I have a few of questions.
>
>     Should a replication-segment be generalized to be a special SID (say a multicast SID allocated from a multicast SID block)?
,
[RP] This is a good question. We have left this unspecified in draft
because the Replication SID can be assigned either from SRGB, in which
case it would be same on all nodes of Replication segment, or from
SRLB where it could be different on the nodes.
>
>     Should a replication-segment be associated with just a set of downstream SIDs without the  node-IDs? Where the downstream SIDs may be replication-segments or normal SIDs in some cases (for example when the downstream nodes are egresses).

[RP] I don't understand the question. Can you clarify what you mean by
"... without Node-IDs"? Note that Node-IDs are part of the Replication
segment state, but only Replication SIDs are in the label stack.
>
>     Should a state in a node for a replication-segment be removed? If a state is stored in a node (each node) for a (each) replication segment of a (each) SR P2MP path, there may be some scalability issue. This seems not consistent with the principles of the segment routing, in which no state is stored in the core of the network.

[RP] As mentioned in Introduction of the draft, there is no state
required on intermediate nodes that are not part of a Replication
segment.

>
> Best Regards,
> Huaimo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:44 PM
> To: bruno.decraene@orange.com; spring@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call for draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment
>
> Hi Spring WG
>
> Support adoption.
>
> Willing to work on the document, and already participating in related documents in PCE and IDR.
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
>
>
> On 2020-06-22, 10:46 AM, "spring on behalf of bruno.decraene@orange.com" <spring-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of bruno.decraene@orange.com> wrote:
>
>     Hi SPRING WG,
>
>     Authors of draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment [1] have asked for WG adoption.
>
>     Please indicate your support, comments, or objection, for adopting this draft as a working group item by July 6th 2020.
>
>     Could those who are willing to work on this document, please notify the list. That gives us an indication of the energy level in the working group to work on this.
>
>     As a reminder, the call for IPR has been done last November. [2]
>
>     Thanks,
>     Regards,
>     Bruno, Jim, Joel
>
>     [1] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment&amp;data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7Ce48fdc087ead47f7a46e08d816fe4085%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637284628562490951&amp;sdata=0yc%2BfZ4uA72ldbCIevjFKvFQA%2BSp2Wh7%2BOdCZsM4yaI%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     [2] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fspring%2FtW-HHK7QzCw3ZBbFD0Dl7Eszd3k%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7Ce48fdc087ead47f7a46e08d816fe4085%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637284628562490951&amp;sdata=2e1JSoFWYpZfLe9ODWtGjI%2B82O0Y4cFCeKDGo8%2Fe%2FIs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
>
>     _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>     Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>     pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation.. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>     a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>     Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
>     This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
>     they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>     If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
>     As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>     Thank you.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     spring mailing list
>     spring@ietf.org
>     https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&amp;data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7Ce48fdc087ead47f7a46e08d816fe4085%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637284628562490951&amp;sdata=2hoiiN9lCan74sNUI8WNQnpBEDTVH8QK0RA1Y47yP7Y%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&amp;data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7Ce48fdc087ead47f7a46e08d816fe4085%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637284628562490951&amp;sdata=2hoiiN9lCan74sNUI8WNQnpBEDTVH8QK0RA1Y47yP7Y%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&amp;data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7Ce48fdc087ead47f7a46e08d816fe4085%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637284628562490951&amp;sdata=2hoiiN9lCan74sNUI8WNQnpBEDTVH8QK0RA1Y47yP7Y%3D&amp;reserved=0
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring