[spring] Éric Vyncke's Abstain on draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-29: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 14 January 2021 13:45 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: spring@ietf.org
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750813A149B; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 05:45:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org, Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, jmh@joelhalpern.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.24.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <161063195344.21196.18421736083772618634@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 05:45:53 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Y6oPz8yDIuutZSJQAE0x09KGD5M>
Subject: [spring] Éric Vyncke's Abstain on draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-29: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:45:54 -0000
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-29: Abstain When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document even if I am balloting ABSTAIN, this is useful piece and it should really be improved to fix my ABSTAIN reasons so that I could actively support it. Read my ABSTAIN ballot as "I oppose this document but understand that others differ and am not going to stand in the way of the others" per https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/iesg-ballots/ . Please note that I am neither a YANG expert nor a segment routing one (hence my ABSTAIN rather than a DISCUSS). Based on title, I was expecting this document to be generic and to see companion YANG models for the MPLS and IPv6 data planes but it seems that this document also augments *only* the MPLS one. The asymmetry does not look good to me... Are the authors/WG sure that the IPv6 YANG model can also be specified by augmenting this model (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-yang-00 is still a -00 ...) and relying on types defined in ietf-segment-routing-common ? Especially when noting that the authors are different ? The YANG model for SR is really short (mostly meaningless except for one more tag in the namespace tree): "module: ietf-segment-routing augment /rt:routing: +--rw segment-routing" To be honest, I strongly dislike the fact that there is no common element between the YANG modules for MPLS and IPv6 data planes inside ietf-segment-routing. I admit that I am not an SR expert but I would have expected more common elements: policies, routing protocols, SID, link bundles, ... even if the leaves could be instantiated as generic types to be augmented later. One additional regret is that the document shepherd write-up is really really short. But it includes the most important element (to my eyes): the WG feedback & consensus. Regards, -éric
- [spring] Éric Vyncke's Abstain on draft-ietf-spri… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [spring] Éric Vyncke's Abstain on draft-ietf-… Acee Lindem (acee)