[spring] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-bfd (ends Dec/16)

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 10 December 2024 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B814C14F6EE; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:53:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cpRL-YNZMj9G; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:53:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81734C14F71B; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:53:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-385d7b4da2bso4791883f8f.1; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:53:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1733849628; x=1734454428; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8HENzcEyw+93qi0K5gTtynCbPSNA5QiJpytf4bARcRQ=; b=TyWqTyH8O+IwiCWsEy1IS3ZmmcVT8021QDoDtq+bwVM/eh+vvM9IKC2VsIdhwTp4lR Slz+Mrzi+e+cTlcsxhs5geqU37/5T3pkT43t7OM//fRGKWw2RewYjMatLxVE8YuyxbvJ wgD6TfN9GopTM/tCUieDreLaCieCbp+FmWOGMjBuJfM9qFlq1gzj8bmer81l/bKE7XyS FPNQ4Sueh0RbZsynxlxGGsFlVnTFhpL3ZxwA8PCoQCl2x0lZT08XXC03v2EiY+Jh69XT uLSBjyXtM/vejZJv57+snh3AeIRVkYTARFDGXQ25XfhOtVGfP+xQ3YACdy6W2odV3SwU UdHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1733849628; x=1734454428; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=8HENzcEyw+93qi0K5gTtynCbPSNA5QiJpytf4bARcRQ=; b=kZ3iRn408Tc7jqb5OJekxBkqtAMFywzU7Zbd4jS5iWVLgPFWLtXhtHxAJaG0O7QzFa kT5Rqs7StDRKJEuf7ne2xk3P6MPA6KZ12WHH6xjBkveEvUfybt2YNZKu75IyR3G4Lr5W IUj/qRKgynymsKmxBpkTC2Ijo0fBVYxwUstlD56tKdcAgWcSkM88qPFbyWrF98vl32cM 8YXMvcyInZQmLTeIaqBXcND39ttSNcf2OzL/9TUfWQQNVU11GyzN37oIlr3TKoY/Du0O Z/UPOGFXMpfhbt+yXnrIMSpW8F1u6erP4/QshLxGDcNWC/8A61B9ZHQtYdNrv4LK2//7 xk2A==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUXS3svpUpLm2P6sXMeLXotZzPHNibelzdAPG7dcdO3i1aEMaacghzEsbzNkNT8O/zXCNn4QQ2kCQ==@ietf.org, AJvYcCV4W1alPKAkuI8OzaKFbsrwePFWCIcQkeC7e6t+sUXe44sLlksC0go0rNfrjN1Loi6L4xob3Sut1Wo9Z/tIIgupIrENBuM=@ietf.org, AJvYcCWyd4Y825LiU+fLQJDGXMkgniVVL24fh5YMh7t9QffPsvgFuXVEQhytiaU3F9bZqqHSu3jGSYYfR9uMvazRwQ==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz+s99k/EemmLoBNcDo272JYzRz17qOI8lfLXR6k4W0Fh2QR4fu 1Jbg7G33zhbVLj9pNCvaSEXR0nJK28fIZ2CvuHBlbs8AphTLEUGQn2GVnTl6pANlPLzzcTAJnJb p56y9wzoTbbIE/7SN0HidmnjFIj3XTw==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv2n9Sn68CMjx7MhfzF2XAaGGnBr7H1mKvTzm1+Ax5TfshTusuT7ar4HNPbjTR xGTRB5LqI1YJIGm+A7uwrx4/ZM1+wM1/og089
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFqV7IfmpxpshARv5BWyIRoQMWm7wtElWSZKiTmT1Np/vnqenQ2cV1Whku9NHyi8iCgZtUDRxXzUQ5i/YY2prU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:4705:b0:385:ded5:86ee with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38645400e6dmr4825801f8f.57.1733849627488; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:53:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMMESsyHEPJyg0OqE3NgPKL42KM-6vAwFo-xdvmKMsLs6yvwoA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESsz0rdMaKHStNhVfNjxCW6fC0O5eB9c3HzMfmE71Dc5mBQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsz0rdMaKHStNhVfNjxCW6fC0O5eB9c3HzMfmE71Dc5mBQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:53:37 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVHCBOvZ+X3BCNM4RcZRfFg0T6MR0EUcS4L3_3eQFnwGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000023fab40628ed5332"
Message-ID-Hash: 5NEZFV3YN5ZYQJFBEK74E6NWOHPPGBLG
X-Message-ID-Hash: 5NEZFV3YN5ZYQJFBEK74E6NWOHPPGBLG
X-MailFrom: gregimirsky@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spring.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, rtg-bfd@ietf.org, draft-ietf-spring-bfd@ietf.org, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [spring] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-bfd (ends Dec/16)
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG (SPRING)" <spring.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/YJNmPhNd5Yt_43LuOfoYMtjBdt8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spring-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spring-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spring-leave@ietf.org>

Hi, Alvaro et al.,
As a co-author, I support moving this document forward to the publication.

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 11:51 AM Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> [Sorry for the bad formatting. :-(]
>
> [cc'ing the bfd WG]
>
>
> Dear WG:
>
> This message starts a two-week WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-bfd,
> ending on December/16. From the Abstract:
>
>    This document describes using BFD for monitoring individual segment
>    lists of candidate paths of an SR Policy. It documents the use of
>    various BFD modes and features such as BFD Demand mode, Seamless BFD,
>    and BFD Echo function with the BFD Control packet payload in the
> SR-MPLS
>    domain. Also, this document defines how to use Label Switched Path Ping
>    to bootstrap a BFD session, with optional control of selecting a
> segment
>    list in the reverse direction of the BFD session.
>
>
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-bfd/
>
>
> Please review the draft and consider whether it is ready to move towards
> publication as an RFC. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate
> support or opposition -- this is not a vote and silence is not consent.
>
> If you are willing to provide an in-depth review, please go ahead.
>
> The chairs are particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people
> who are not authors of the document.  The Shepherd review pointed at a few
> items that would benefit from further consideration by the WG, please take
> a look:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/E_31dtV4Qx2MM7u9nxuVUnzMOjk/
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alvaro (for the spring-chairs)
>
> On December 2, 2024 at 2:42:25 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana.ietf@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> [cc'ing the bfd WG]Dear WG:This message starts a two-week WG Last Call for
> draft-ietf-spring-bfd, ending on December/16. From the Abstract:   This
> document describes using BFD for monitoring individual segment    lists of
> candidate paths of an SR Policy. It documents the use of    various BFD
> modes and features such as BFD Demand mode, Seamless BFD,    and BFD Echo
> function with the BFD Control packet payload in the SR-MPLS    domain.
> Also, this document defines how to use Label Switched Path Ping    to
> bootstrap a BFD session, with optional control of selecting a segment
>  list in the reverse direction of the BFD session.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-bfd/     Please review
> the draft and consider whether it is ready to move towards publication as
> an RFC. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate support or
> opposition -- this is not a vote and silence is not consent.  If you are
> willing to provide an in-depth review, please go ahead.The chairs are
> particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who are not
> authors of the document.  The Shepherd review pointed at a few items that
> would benefit from further consideration by the WG, please take a look:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/E_31dtV4Qx2MM7u9nxuVUnzMOjk/
>  Thanks!Alvaro (for the spring-chairs)
>
>