[spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-03.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Fri, 25 September 2020 10:19 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: spring@ietf.org
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391F53A1324; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 03:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: spring@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.17.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: spring@ietf.org
Message-ID: <160102917316.31205.3642675360462511634@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 03:19:33 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/_F6tMHpwMGaDKt58oRI46MvfPj0>
Subject: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-03.txt
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:19:33 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking WG of the IETF. Title : Integration of Network Service Header (NSH) and Segment Routing for Service Function Chaining (SFC) Authors : James N Guichard Jeff Tantsura Filename : draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-03.txt Pages : 17 Date : 2020-09-25 Abstract: This document describes two application scenarios where Network Service Header (NSH) and Segment Routing (SR) can be deployed together to support Service Function Chaining (SFC) in an efficient manner while maintaining separation of the service and transport planes as originally intended by the SFC architecture. In both scenarios, SR is responsible for steering packets between SFFs along a given Service Function Path (SFP) while NSH is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the service plane, the SFC instance context, and any associated metadata. These application scenarios demonstrate that NSH and SR can work jointly and complement each other leaving the network operator with the flexibility to use whichever transport technology makes sense in specific areas of their network infrastructure, and still maintain an end-to-end service plane using NSH. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-03 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-03.… internet-drafts
- [spring] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr… James Guichard