[spring] [Spring]Request discussion the colored BGP-LU LSP draft

chen.ran@zte.com.cn Thu, 11 March 2021 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <chen.ran@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E637B3A0A35 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 05:11:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lRmkQ6aKW2BQ for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 05:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A82D3A095F for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 05:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.164.217]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 21658A6252CCB587B06F for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:11:25 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.239]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id EEE4A4CBD995B8501D8A; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:11:24 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp01.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.200]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 12BDBJLU077553; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:11:19 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from chen.ran@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp03[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:11:19 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:11:19 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afb604a16f736699f2a
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202103112111195524012@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: <chen.ran@zte.com.cn>
To: <dhrao@cisco.com>
Cc: <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 12BDBJLU077553
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/_Fp9V0YPEyrELp4jH62G33PaGSU>
Subject: [spring] =?utf-8?q?=5BSpring=5DRequest_discussion_the_colored_BG?= =?utf-8?q?P-LU_LSP_draft?=
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:11:34 -0000

Hi Dhananjaya and WG,


 


We have a solution to solve the same problem ,the link is https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhou-idr-inter-domain-lcu-02,This document describes the colored BGP-LU LSP, in which the routing  prefix not only carries a label(or a sequence of labels), but also carries an unique color attribute which helps to select the underlying logic slice.





 [RFC7911] defines a BGP extension that allows the advertisement of multiple paths of the same address prefix.  It can help with optimal routing and in a network by providing potential alternate or backup paths.  In this document, it is not used for the link backup.  It is only used to advertise multiple paths, whether intra-domain or inter-domain.





Appreciate if you could review and give us comments.





Best Regards,


Ran